We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.


Clear all

Refine your search

Content type


Firm name



296 results found


IAM | Global | 28 May 2019

We must listen to the market to make the most of 5G licensing opportunities, says new Ericsson CIPO

In her first interview since becoming the chief IP officer at Ericsson Christina Petersson has made clear that continuity and adaptability are her


Sullivan & Cromwell LLP | USA | 10 Jan 2019

District Court Holds That FRAND Commitment Does Not Require Licensing at Chip Level: E.D. Texas Holding Is Contrary to Recent N.D. California Decision

On January 7, 2019, in HTC Corp. v. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, Judge Rodney Gilstrap of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of


IAM | USA | 27 Nov 2018

5G patent report was designed for internal and external consumption, says Ericsson IPR strategy head

Mathias Hellman, vice president of IPR strategy and portfolio management at Ericsson, has explained that the company decided to publish its recent


Novagraaf | Global | 20 Nov 2018

IP in M&A: Fusing two businesses

When a business merges or acquires another business, one of the next questions is: what should that newly merged business be called? Opting to ‘fuse’


Bristows | USA | 14 Nov 2018

US District Court confirms that Qualcomm must offer RAND SEP licences to rival chipset manufacturers

In California, Judge Koh has granted partial summary judgment in favour of the FTC against Qualcomm, making an order that Qualcomm must license its


Liu, Shen & Associates | USA, China | 30 Oct 2018

Base of Royalty Calculation for Standard Essential Patent

Disputes over the licensing of Standard Essential Patent (“SEP”) have attracted many attentions in the world. When SEP cases appear, they become hot


Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, PC | USA | 11 Sep 2018

Petitioner’s Reply May Expand Arguments to Address New Claim Constructions Adopted After Institution

In Ericsson Inc. v. Intellectual Ventures I LLC, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated and remanded a final written decision of the


Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP | USA | 5 Sep 2018

PTAB Must Consider Reply Arguments that Merely Expand on Petitioner’s Original Positions

In Ericsson Inc. v. Intellectual Ventures I LLC, No. 2017-1521 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 27, 2018), Ericsson appealed a PTAB decision finding that claims 1-3


Harness, Dickey & Pierce, PLC | USA | 4 Sep 2018

Change In Construction of Claims from Petition Required Board to Allow Petitioner to Respond

In Ericsson Inc. v. Intellectual Ventures I LLC, 2017-1521 (August 27, 2018), the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that the Patent


Jones Day | USA | 31 Aug 2018

Petitioner’s Reply May Expand Presented Arguments and Address New Claim Constructions

On August 27, 2018, the Federal Circuit vacated and remanded the PTAB’s finding that claims 1-3, 6-9, and 12-14 of U.S. Patent No. 5,602,831 (“the

Previous page 1 2 3 ...