We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 452

Christian Louboutin red sole failed to qualify as a Trademark!
  • RNA Technology and IP Attorneys
  • European Union, India
  • June 25 2018

While Christian Louboutin had a favourable decision from European Court of Justice (ECJ), in similar circumstances, the High Court of Delhi dismissed

Watch your defense
  • Khaitan & Co
  • India
  • June 22 2018

Denying the plaintiff's design rights is a common opening defense in design infringement cases. In Vega Auto Accessories (P) Ltd (Plaintiff) v S K

Question of Jurisdiction in Online Transactions
  • Chadha & Chadha Intellectual Property Law Firm
  • India
  • June 22 2018

Over the last decade or so, the internet has become an important part of our lives. The internet we know now is indispensable, both for individuals

Trademark - Section 124 applicable to stay infringement suit and not suit for passing-off
  • Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan
  • India
  • June 19 2018

Observing that the defendant had never abandoned the plea of invalidity and had filed the rectification proceedings within three months before IPAB

Arbitration Regional Overview: Asia Pacific International Arbitration Newsletter June 2018
  • Garrigues
  • Asia-Pacific, Australia, Bangladesh, China, India
  • June 18 2018

An Australian court has recently granting a US$20 million freezing order against a Spanish-owned engineering company Duró Felguera Australia

India: Internet and the determination of jurisdiction in the Case of Trade Mark Infringement
  • SS Rana & Co
  • USA, India
  • June 12 2018

Internet has marked its presence in the commercial world in an unprecedented way. With businesses moving online to escalate their accessibility to a

Delhi High Court refuses to grant injuction restraining Vodafone’s second BIT arbitration against India
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • India
  • June 11 2018

In a decision dated 7 May 2018, the Delhi High Court dismissed the Government of India’s application to declare Vodafone’s second BIT arbitration

No passing-off in abbreviation used along with another different mark
  • Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan
  • India
  • June 7 2018

In a case involving passing-off by use of trademark VAC-PAC, Delhi High Court has dismissed the suit with costs. It observed that plaintiff used the

Controller frowns upon parties for failure to disclose
  • RNA Technology and IP Attorneys
  • India
  • June 6 2018

In a recently decided post grant opposition filed by Ms GuanGXI LIUGONG MACHINERY CO. LTD against, J.C. Bamford Excavators Ltd.'s (herein after

India: Delhi High Court dismisses Saregama’s infringement suit against Eros Digital
  • SS Rana & Co
  • India
  • June 4 2018

In the above case, the Plaintiff has acquired rights in numerous songs, including regional and Hindi film as well as non-film sound track music from