We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-10 of 16

小议天价拖车费的保险理赔问题
  • DeHeng Law Offices
  • China
  • August 4 2014

近期对于天价拖车费的问题引起人们的关注很多司机本是发生车祸遭遇危难却又祸不单行摊上天价拖车费的纠纷交警等相关部门又推诿暧昧


Standing Committee of the National People's Congress gives interpretation in Democratic Republic of the Congo v. FG Hemisphere Associates: sovereign immunity in Hong Kong is confirmed to be absolute
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • Hong Kong
  • September 1 2011

The Standing Committee of the National People's Congress ("SCNPC") has given its interpretation of certain questions referred to it by the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal ("CFA") in its landmark provisional judgment in Democratic Republic of the Congo v. FG Hemisphere Associates.


When does non-payment constitute repudiation of a contract?
  • Rajah & Tann Asia
  • Singapore
  • July 29 2011

The case of Chua Tian Chu and another v Chin Bay Ching and another 2011 SGHC 126 ("Chua Tian Chu") serves as a useful reminder of some of the general legal principles applicable to construction disputes over payment and damages for delayed completion.


Google China drops Beijing free rider
  • Gowling WLG
  • China
  • August 10 2009

Search engine giant Google began its formal use of Chinese name Guge in 2006 when it established Chinese subsidiary Google China.


Courts continue confirmation of arbitration awards
  • Jorden Burt LLP
  • USA
  • December 24 2008

Since our last post on arbitration award confirmationvacation, eight opinions of some note have been entered, all of which confirmed or declined to vacate arbitration awards.


List of 'prohibited marks' increases - Red Crystal recognized as an additional mark protected by Geneva Convention
  • McMillan LLP
  • Canada
  • August 5 2008

The Trade-marks Act (Canada) provides that no person shall adopt or use in connection with a business, as a trade-mark or otherwise, any mark consisting of or so nearly resembling as to be likely to be mistaken for, a mark that that is listed in section 9 of that Act.



Sim Chee Siong
  • Rajah & Tann Asia

Lie Yi Fang Paul
  • Rajah & Tann Asia