We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-10 of 574

The North Carolina Business Court Explores the Boundaries of “Substantial Aggravating Circumstances”
  • Ellis & Winters LLP
  • USA
  • October 24 2017

Courts have long recognized limitations on claims brought under N.C. Gen. Stat. 75-1.1 in conjunction with alleged breaches of contract. Although


There is a dispute resolution clause in my agreement. Do I have to comply with it or can I commence Court proceedings?
  • HopgoodGanim
  • Australia
  • May 30 2017

Commonly, commercial agreements contain a dispute resolution clause that sets out a process to be followed in the event of a dispute arising under the


Misbehave at your peril - a warning for developers on conduct
  • DLA Piper
  • United Kingdom
  • December 6 2016

The recent case of Ottercroft sent out a clear message from the courts to developers that poor conduct will not be tolerated and could lead to


ACCC investigations: A short guide on what to do and how to prepare
  • DLA Piper
  • Australia
  • August 29 2016

The ACCC may become aware of potential breaches of competition and consumer law as a result of: complaints (for example, by your customers


Misleading and deceptive conduct by directors - a timely reminder of the repercussions of making a misleading market announcement
  • McCullough Robertson
  • Australia
  • August 24 2016

A recent prosecution by ASIC against an ASX listed mining exploration company serves as a timely reminder about the repercussions of making


Guest Post Marion Even with a Road Map, Only One Dubious Claim Navigates Preemption
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • USA
  • August 17 2016

Here's another guest post, this time from Reed Smith's Elizabeth Graham Minerd. This post concerns PMA preemption, and a second opinion largely


Forgery May Not Constitute “Theft” Under an Employee Dishonesty Coverage
  • Cozen O'Connor
  • USA
  • August 8 2016

Ruling in favor of the insurer on a motion for summary judgment, on July 29, 2016 the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals held that under the terms of a


Don't Make Promises You Cannot Keep: Developer Behaviour in the Spotlight
  • Dentons
  • United Kingdom
  • July 11 2016

In Ottercroft Ltd v. Scandia Care Ltd (1) and Rahimain (2), the court of Appeal has upheld a first instance decision to award an injunction against a


Court of Appeal Denies Investor Appeal on the basis that the Claim was Statute Barred
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • July 5 2016

In 2012, an investor commenced an action against the defendant, WFG Securities of Canada Inc. ("WFG") for negligence, misrepresentation, breach of


Lanham Act case settles after jury verdict
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • November 9 2011

Judge Pallmeyer issued an order dismissing this patent case with prejudice based upon the parties' settlement.