We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results:1-10 of 273

General prohibition on selling at loss
  • Wilhelm & Associes
  • Spain, European Union
  • August 11 2017

In the context of a request for a preliminary ruling, the European Court of Justice has analyzed the articulation between the directive 200529EC

ECJ finds Spanish suspensions incompatible with consumer protection
  • Dentons
  • European Union
  • April 22 2016

In the cases of Sales Sinues v. Caixabank SA and Drame Ba v. Catalunya Caixa SA, the ECJ’s General Court has ruled that domestic Spanish legislation

ECJ addresses meaning of "consumer" under the EU Unfair Contract Terms Directive
  • CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP
  • European Union
  • April 1 2016

In a recent case, Horatiu Ovidiu Costea v. Volksbank Romania, the Court of Justice of the European Union (the "ECJ") clarified the meaning of

Spotlight Case Review: Who is a consumer for the purposes of consumer protection legislation?
  • Romania, European Union
  • February 25 2016

The European Court of Justice recently considered a case referred to it by a Romanian court, Horatiu Ovidiu Costea v SC Volksbank Romania SA C-11014

ECJ: erroneous information in the context of after-sales service may lead to a misleading commercial practice
  • White & Case LLP
  • European Union
  • July 20 2015

After-Sales Service: Don't Be Misled! European Court of Justice Rules: Erroneous Information Provided by an Undertaking to a Consumer in the

After sales-service don't be misled! - European Court of Justice rules: erroneous information provided by an undertaking to a consumer in the context of after-sales service is a misleading commercial practice
  • White & Case LLP
  • European Union
  • July 20 2015

In the European Union, the rules relating to unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices are subject to national law; however, the Unfair

Plain, intelligible language necessary for insurance contracts
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • European Union
  • July 15 2015

The ECJ, in the case of Jean-Claude Van Hove v CNP Assurances SA, confirmed that insurers must make sure their consumer customers understand the

Issue relating to single consumer triggers finding of ‘misleading commercial practice’
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • European Union
  • July 14 2015

The ECJ provided a preliminary ruling on Nemzeti Fogyasztovedelmi Hatosag v UPC Magyarorszag, which could have major implications on commercial

Seller presumed liable if lack of conformity becomes apparent within six months
  • De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
  • European Union
  • July 8 2015

The European Court of Justice recently ruled that if a product turns out not to conform with the consumer contract within six months of delivery

Once-off provision of incorrect information to a single consumer a 'misleading commercial practice'
  • A&L Goodbody
  • Ireland
  • May 12 2015

The ECJ has held in the case of Nemzeti Fogyasztóvédelmi Hatóság v UPC Magyarország Kft (Case C-38813) that an incorrect communication to a single