We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 19

8th Circuit Agrees Failure to Show Actual Reliance Bars Plaintiff’s Consumer Fraud Claims
  • Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
  • USA
  • April 29 2016

I’m back this month reporting on another circuit court opinion affirming the dismissal of consumer fraud allegations in a putative class action


Savvy Cosmetics Consumers Know Better, Says Ninth Circuit
  • Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
  • USA
  • March 31 2016

Everyone likes a bit of fancy packaging with their $25 lip gloss. Plaintiff Angela Ebner was presumably no exception, that is, until she brought a


U.S. Supreme Court Reaffirms Enforceability of Class Arbitration Waivers in Consumer Class Actions
  • Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
  • USA
  • January 4 2016

Four years after requiring enforcement of class arbitration waivers in consumer contracts in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion,1 the U.S. Supreme Court


Connor v. First Student, Inc.: California’s Background Check Law Under Review
  • Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
  • USA
  • December 28 2015

On November 24, 2015, the California Supreme Court granted a petition for review of Connor v. First Student, Inc., 239 Cal. App. 4th 526 (2015), an


Cybersecurity Becomes Law
  • Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
  • USA
  • December 21 2015

During the 2013 holiday season, retailers were targeted in some of the largest cyber attacks on record, compromising tens of millions of consumer


District court denies class certification for lack of predominance in common defect case
  • Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
  • USA
  • September 22 2015

Defeating class certification is always a hot topic of interest for companies facing large consumer class actions. A class may be certified under


Ninth Circuit could weigh in on ascertainability requirements in consumer class actions
  • Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
  • USA
  • December 16 2014

We have been covering developments relating to how courts are interpreting Rule 23's implicit ascertainability requirement, and have noted that



Eric S. Hochstadt
  • Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP

Carolyn Davis
  • Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP