We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search

Refine your search

Content type

Tags

Author

3 results found

Article

Proskauer Rose LLP | USA | 27 Feb 2015

Ninth Circuit: spousal consent not required under top-hat plans

The Ninth Circuit held that a participant's brother, rather than his spouse, was the proper beneficiary of benefits under a profit sharing plan. In

Previous page 1 Next page