We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.


Refine your search

Content type


Firm name


464 results found


Ogletree Deakins | USA | 8 Feb 2019

Arizona Law Prohibiting Municipalities From Enacting Employee Benefits Ordinances Held Unconstitutional

The Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One, has ruled that the Arizona State Legislature overstepped its authority in 2016, when it prohibited


Ogletree Deakins | USA | 18 Dec 2018

The No-Legged Stool? ACA Declared Unconstitutional in Surprise Decision

Author: Timothy G. Verrall (Houston) The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) has proven to be quite resistant to attempts to dismantle


Carlton Fields | USA | 15 Jan 2015

In Florida, recognition of same-sex marriage will impact employers

On January 6, Florida became the 36th state to recognize same-sex marriage. This development came as the result of several recent state and federal


Day Pitney LLP | USA | 16 Jun 2014

Post-Windsor decision holds exclusion of same-sex spouse does not violate ERISA

On May 1, 2014, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York held in Roe v. Empire Blue Cross Blue Shield that a provision


Proskauer Rose LLP | USA | 10 Sep 2013

The post-DOMA world relating to ERISA-governed employee benefit plans

As a result of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Windsor, 133 S. Ct. 2675 (2013), in which the Court held that Section 3 of the


Haynes and Boone LLP | USA | 3 Sep 2013

The demise of DOMA’s core: employer response avenues in the wake of Windsor

On June 26, 2013, in a 5-4 decision, the United States Supreme Court issued a much anticipated ruling in United States v. Windsor, 1 holding that


Blank Rome LLP | USA | 8 Jul 2013

Impact of DOMA case on employee benefit plans

In U.S. v. Windsor, the United States Supreme Court held that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (the "DOMA") is unconstitutional. The DOMA was


Foley Hoag LLP | USA | 3 Jul 2013

Supreme Court finds DOMA to be unconstitutional -- impact on employers explained

On June 26, 2013, a majority of the Supreme Court held in United States v. Windsor that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which


Hodgson Russ LLP | USA | 28 Jun 2013

Supreme Court declares DOMA unconstitutional

On June 26, the U.S. Supreme Court in United States vs. Windsor ruled that Section 3 of the Federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is


Dentons | USA | 27 Jun 2013

DOMA is done; a hodgepodge looms

On June 26, 2013, the US Supreme Court, in US v. Windsor, invalidated Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). For 17 years, Section 3 of

Previous page 1 2 3 ...