We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.


Clear all

Refine your search

Content type


Firm name


193 results found


Saul Ewing LLP | USA | 9 Jul 2014

ERISA self-insured health plan not required to cover same sex spouses

In Roe v. Empire Blue Cross Blue Shield, No. 12-cv-04788 (NSR), 58 EBC 1077, 2014 WL 1760343 (S.D. N.Y. May 1, 2014), the United States District


Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (Bryan Cave) | USA | 30 May 2014

Same-sex spouse exclusion under health plan does not violate ERISA

Earlier this month, a New York Federal District Court held that the exclusion of same-sex spouses from coverage under a health plan, even though


Proskauer Rose LLP | USA | 21 May 2014

Despite Windsor, federal court rejects challenge to a self-insured ERISA health plan’s denial of coverage for same-sex spouses

Following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in US v. Windsor, the requirement that an ERISA health plan provide health coverage for same-sex spouses


Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP | USA | 19 Aug 2011

New York State issues tax guidance on same-sex marriage and employee benefits

On July 29, 2011, the New York State Department of Tax and Finance issued guidance regarding the impact of New York's legalization of same-sex marriage on the tax treatment of employee benefits provided to same-sex spouses.

Previous page 1 2 3 ...