We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-10 of 26

Fast tracking evidence for foreign proceedings
  • Piper Alderman
  • USA, Australia
  • December 6 2018

The need for the production of evidence from persons residing within Australia for foreign proceedings is becoming more prevalent, including the use


No-deal Brexit guidance: Civil and commercial cooperation
  • Law Society In-House Division
  • United Kingdom, European Union
  • November 8 2018

The Law Society has published guidance for solicitors that highlights the changes in civil and commercial cooperation that will occur should the UK


Litigation: Enforcement of foreign judgments in Italy
  • Legance
  • Global, Italy
  • October 29 2018

A structured guide to the enforcement of foreign judgments in Italy


A litigator’s yearbook: 2017 (England and Wales)
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom, European Union
  • December 12 2017

As we see another year out, it’s a good time to look back at what 2017 has had in store. In this post we summarise some of the key developments from


Arrangement on mutual taking of evidence between Hong Kong and Mainland
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • China, Hong Kong
  • April 7 2017

The Arrangement on Mutual Taking of Evidence in Civil and Commercial Matters between the Courts of the Mainland and Hong Kong (Arrangement) recently


Delaware Court of Chancery rebuffs foreign anti-discovery law
  • Baker McKenzie
  • USA
  • February 13 2015

The civil law tradition's aversion to common law approaches to pretrial discoveryand especially the expansive, party-conducted gathering of


The French blocking statute, the Hague Evidence Convention, and the case law: lessons for French parties responding to American discovery
  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • USA, France
  • July 22 2014

The breadth of United States (“U.S.”) discovery rules generates both consternation and controversy within foreign legal circles, even in the United


Court of Appeal confirms Norwich Pharmacal orders cannot be used to obtain evidence for foreign proceedings
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • March 12 2013

The Court of Appeal has confirmed that the English courts do not have jurisdiction to make a Norwich Pharmacal order that evidence be produced for


The French blocking statute, the Hague Evidence Convention, and the case law: lessons for French parties responding to American discovery
  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • USA, France
  • August 22 2011

The breadth of United States (U.S.) discovery rules generates both consternation and controversy within foreign legal circles, even in the United Kingdom where discovery originated.


Effective use of discovery obtained pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 in proceedings before Australian courts
  • Jones Day
  • USA, Australia
  • November 11 2010

This Commentary is the latest in a Jones Day series that explores the availability of discovery mechanisms for obtaining evidence located within the United States for use in proceedings outside of the United States.