We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 95

Over 40 Need Not Apply? Your Age-Neutral Recruiting Practices May Violate the ADEA
  • Hogan Lovells
  • USA
  • May 15 2018

Everyone knows that employers covered by the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) cannot intentionally refuse to hire job applicants because


UpcomingNew CFIUS Filing: Beijing Jianguang Asset Management Co., and RJR Technologies, Inc.
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • China
  • October 20 2017

Status: UpcomingNew Filing Acquirer: Beijing Jianguang Asset Management Co., Ltd. (China) Acquired: RJR Technologies, Inc. (US) Industry: Electronic


Where Liability Found, Punitive Damages Not A Forgone Conclusion
  • McGuireWoods LLP
  • USA
  • September 6 2017

Late last month a Florida jury returned a verdict in the 40th Engle progeny case to go to trial against R.J. Reynolds Tobacco (RJR) since the start


Fourth Circuit: An Imprudent ERISA Fiduciary Avoids Liability if a Prudent Fiduciary Would Have Reached the Same Decision
  • Arent Fox LLP
  • USA
  • May 19 2017

As a case that has lasted fifteen years reaches its likely conclusion, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals has clarified the “loss causation”


Eleventh Circuit Overturns Decades of Precedent in Holding that Job Applicants Cannot Claim Disparate Impact Under the ADEA
  • Ogletree Deakins
  • USA
  • November 10 2016

Sitting en banc, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently issued a ruling that affects whether job applicants may bring disparate impact claims


What Happens in Europe, Stays in Europe? Applying RICO to Foreign Injury, Conduct
  • Barnes & Thornburg LLP
  • USA, European Union
  • June 30 2016

Recently, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its decision in RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Community, et. al., clarifyingin partthe extent to which


U.S. Supreme Court Finds RICO Statute Applies to Activity Offshore
  • Horwood Marcus & Berk
  • USA
  • June 28 2016

The U.S. Supreme Court on June 20, 2016, inRJR Nabisco Inc. v. European Community, 579 U.S. ___, addressed the application of the RICO statute 18 U.S


The Supreme Court Defines RICO’s Territorial Reach
  • Baker McKenzie
  • USA
  • June 27 2016

In its June 20, 2016 ruling in RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Community, the U.S. Supreme Court settled a long-running debate on the extraterritorial


RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Community: Supreme Court Limits Extraterritorial Application of RICO
  • Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP
  • USA
  • June 27 2016

On June 20, 2016, in a 4-3 decision the Supreme Court decided RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Community holding that certain substantive prohibitions


RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. The European Community
  • Baker Botts LLP
  • USA, European Union
  • June 27 2016

On June 20, 2016, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. The European Community, 579 U.S. ___ (2016), providing greater