We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 2,027

Public policy and offensive trademarks
  • Novagraaf
  • USA, European Union
  • May 4 2018

Arguably the most significant criteria to be met in order to successfully register a trademark are that the mark applied for must be available for


Silberstein v. Fox Entertainment Group, Inc.
  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • USA
  • April 25 2018

Ninth Circuit affirms dismissal of trademark infringement claims against Fox Entertainment Group Inc. relating to the “Scrat” character from


When Your Trademark Is A False Advertisement
  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • USA
  • April 13 2018

This article follows up on my 2015 Law360 article "Your Trademark Could Be A False Advertisement" regarding false advertising challenges to brand


Interesting and Useful Cases in Torts and Insurance - August and September 2017 in the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals
  • Nexsen Pruet
  • USA
  • April 11 2018

Nexsen Pruet attorney Marc Manos, a member of the SC Bar Torts and Insurance Practice Section Council, sheds light on a few recent cases from the


Riding on the Coattails of Crypto-Mania: Regulatory Warnings and TrademarkTradename Implications
  • Fenwick & West LLP
  • USA
  • April 5 2018

Over the last several months, a number of companies that have had no history of pursuing blockchain technology or incorporating it into their


Does Your Trademark Have Relevant Artistic Expression? If So, Your Mark May Have Greater First Amendment Rights Than You Think
  • Newmeyer & Dillion LLP
  • USA
  • April 4 2018

Traditionally speaking, we think of a 'trademark' protected under the Lanham Act as a mark used to identify and distinguish a good or service from


Expert’s Shortcomings to be Weighed by a Jury
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • April 4 2018

Judge Kennelly denied defendant A Top’s motions for summary judgment and to exclude the testimony and survey evidence of plaintiff Bodum’s survey


Willful Counterfeiting Merits Permanent Trademark Injunction
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • March 26 2018

Judge Shah granted plaintiffs Luxottica and Oakley (collectively “Luxottica”) Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 motion for summary judgment in this Lanham Act


Intellectual Property Law Update: Part 2
  • FisherBroyles LLP
  • USA
  • March 22 2018

Anyone of a certain age remembers the late comedian George Carlin’s 1972 bit called “Seven Dirty Words.”


Now, Almost Anything Goes but is it Good Business for You?
  • FisherBroyles LLP
  • USA
  • March 22 2018

Anyone of a certain age remembers the late comedian George Carlin's 1972 bit called "Seven Dirty Words." For decades, just as you could not say