We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 3,874

The Data Protection Authority’s powers are now aligned with GDPR
  • Nestor Nestor Diculescu Kingston Petersen
  • Romania
  • June 20 2018

Law No. 129 2018 for amending and supplementing the Law No.1022005 regarding the establishment, organization and functioning of the National


PGS v. Iancu - The Post-SAS Landscape Develops
  • Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, PC
  • USA
  • June 20 2018

The Supreme Court held in SAS Institute Inc. v. Iancu, 138 S. Ct. 1348 (2018), that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (“PTAB” or “the Board”


Who’s Kidding Who?
  • Oblon
  • USA
  • June 18 2018

A Feature Article of Law360 entitled “Ex-PTAB Judges Say Board Policies Don’t Squelch Dissents,” by Ryan Davis, argued that policies of the Patent


DOJ Required to Produce to Media Organization Certain Information Related to Siemens AG Monitor
  • Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
  • USA
  • June 14 2018

Companies subject to independent compliance monitors appointed as part of corporate resolutions with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the U.S


Freelancer or worker: what does the Supreme Court’s Pimlico Plumbers v Smith verdict mean for businesses?
  • Taylor Vinters LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • June 13 2018

Today’s Supreme Court verdict in favour of plumber Gary Smith v Pimlico Plumbers is yet another step taken by the courts to protect workers in the gig


Supreme Court says Pimlico Plumbers are workers
  • Lewis Silkin
  • United Kingdom
  • June 13 2018

In the latest major development in a series of cases on employment status, the Supreme Court has rejected an appeal by Pimlico Plumbers and confirmed


Overhaul of gross negligence manslaughter in healthcare expected following the Williams Review
  • RadcliffesLeBrasseur
  • United Kingdom
  • June 11 2018

The report of the ‘Williams Review’, which was tasked with scrutinising the offence of gross negligence manslaughter (GNM) in healthcare after the


Federal Circuit Rules that Pre-SAS Appeals from Partially Instituted IPRs Can Proceed
  • Perkins Coie LLP
  • USA
  • June 11 2018

SAS Institute Inc. v. Iancu, 138 S. Ct. 1348 (2018), established a clear rule requiring institution on all challenged claims in future IPR proceedings


No SAS-based Relief on Appeal, Unless Requested
  • Marshall Gerstein & Borun LLP
  • USA
  • June 8 2018

Left in the wake of the Supreme Court’s SAS decision (discussed here) are a number of appeals pending before the Federal Circuit concerning Patent


Federal Circuit Interprets SAS as Applying to Claims and Grounds
  • Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox PLLC
  • USA
  • June 8 2018

In the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in SAS Institute v. Iancuwhich did away with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB