Winston & Strawn LLP | USA | 23 Apr 2018
Last week, a federal district judge in Chicago dismissed a non-compete case--at the pleading stage--finding that the non-competition…
Reed Smith LLP | USA | 4 Aug 2017
About two years ago, in our post "How Does a Bad Idea Get Implanted," we discussed what at the time seemed a California peculiar argument that the…
Dechert LLP | USA | 17 Sep 2012
Out of Illinois comes a medical device case with odd and smelly facts.
Foley & Lardner LLP | USA | 16 May 2011
In May 2009, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Department of Health & Human Services, Office of the Inspector General (HHS-OIG) announced, with great fanfare, a new initiative to combat health care fraud: the Health Care Fraud Prevention and Enforcement Action Team (HEAT).
Locke Lord LLP | USA | 9 Dec 2008
Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Riegel, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois recently held that the Food and Drug Administration’s (“FDA”) extensive premarket approval (“PMA”) process for Class III medical devices preempts state law causes of action for injuries allegedly caused by those devices.
With more than 350 attorneys, Stoel Rives is a leader in corporate, energy, environmental, intellectual property, labor & employment, land use &…