We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results:1-10 of 32

Unpacking patent box: Busting the myths
  • Griffith Hack
  • Australia, OECD
  • July 18 2016

With the rise of patent box regimes across the world and a push for a program to be adopted in Australia, there’s an increasing amount of media

Blue vs. Red Goggles
  • Graydon Head & Ritchey LLP
  • USA
  • March 22 2016

Imagine a color test where we had to describe colors on a chart while wearing goggles with either blue or red lenses. The binary red vs. blue goggles

Schools reacting to Ebola should take steps to protect cleaning staffs
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • USA
  • October 21 2014

Recent news that a woman with Ebola traveled to Ohio has led many Ohio schools to close out of an abundance of caution to clean entire buildings

Sports eyewear supplier tried to stop online retailers from discounting
  • Baker McKenzie
  • Australia
  • June 6 2011

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) announced that Dragon Alliance South Pacific Pty Ltd has admitted restricting online retailers from selling Dragon's ski goggles, motocross goggles and sunglasses below specified prices.

OSHA issues new enforcement directive on personal protective equipment
  • Ogletree Deakins
  • USA
  • April 14 2011

The federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) recently issued a new directive entitled Enforcement Guidance for Personal Protective Equipment in General Industry (CPL 02-01-050).

New guidance for PPE
  • Ogletree Deakins
  • USA
  • March 10 2011

OSHA recently issued a new enforcement directive, Enforcement Guidance for Personal Protective Equipment in General Industry (CPL 02-01-050).

Busines strategy - Consumer Electronics Show - what happened in Vegas
  • Hogan Lovells
  • USA
  • February 28 2011

Ari Fitzgerald and Dave Thomas report on this year's Consumer Electronic Show in Las Vegas and highlight strategies for monetizing bandwidth in a fast changing technological environment.

Notice by a third party deemed insufficient where policy required notice by the insured
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • December 8 2010

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has held that a third party's notice to an insurer of an occurrence and claim was insufficient to trigger coverage under a general liability insurance policy because the policy specifically required notice by the insured.

Honeywell has standing under Invention Secrecy Act
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • June 30 2010

In Honeywell International, Inc. v. United States, No. 08-5181 (Fed. Cir. May 25, 2010), the Federal Circuit revised its prior opinion of February 18, 2010, by clarifying its remand concerning preissuance damages for the government’s defense against an Invention Secrecy Act (“the Act”) claim.

First sale doctrine did not preclude recovery even though patentee’s predecessor initially sold accused infringing product
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • March 31 2010

In Honeywell International, Inc. v. United States, No. 08-5181 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 18, 2010), the Federal Circuit reversed the Court of Federal Claims’ holding of invalidity based on obviousness and failure to satisfy the written description requirement under 35 U.S.C. 112, and remanded to determine damages.