Refine your search

Content type
Tags
Firm name
Author
Jurisdiction
Industry
Language

1,383 results found

Article
Ask Lexy

McDermott Will & Emery | USA | 17 Aug 2023

New Claim Construction in Patent Owner’s Post-Initiation IPR Response? Sure, Charge Away

Addressing the issue of new claim constructions presented by a patent owner after the institution of inter partes review (IPR) proceedings, the US…
Article
Ask Lexy

McDermott Will & Emery | USA | 18 May 2023

Pending Appeal Does Not Divest Board of Statutory Authority to Institute IPRs

In a case involving sua sponte review, the Director of the US Patent & Trademark Office (PTO) vacated an inter partes review (IPR) decision denying…
Article
Ask Lexy

Davidson Berquist Jackson + Gowdey LLP | Japan, USA | 24 Apr 2023

特許侵害主張に対する効果的な防御 - チュートリアル

特許侵害主張に対する防御は、大学や法科大学院では教えられていません。代わりに、特許侵害主張に対する防御は経験によって学習されます。言い換えれば、ほとんどの場合、より上級の知…
Article
Ask Lexy

Duane Morris LLP | USA | 13 Apr 2023

Finding Needles in a Haystack and Driving Down One-Way Streets: Recent Developments in the Application of Estoppel in Patent Proceedings

Inter partes review (IPR) before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) presents an alternative and more expedient forum for a petitioner to…
Article
Ask Lexy

McDermott Will & Emery | USA | 13 Apr 2023

Console Yourself: Patent Owner Bears IPR Estoppel Burden

Addressing for the first time the standard and burden of proof for the “reasonably could have raised” requirement for inter partes review (IPR)…
Article
Ask Lexy

McDermott Will & Emery | USA | 23 Mar 2023

No One Likes a Sore Winner: IPR Prevailing Party Can’t Appeal

Reaffirming precedent, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reiterated the rule that the prevailing party in an inter partes review (IPR)…
Article
Ask Lexy

McDermott Will & Emery | USA | 23 Mar 2023

Show Your Work: PTO Director’s Procedure for Issuing Instructions Is Reviewable

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s finding under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) that the substance…
Article
Ask Lexy

McDermott Will & Emery | USA | 9 Mar 2023

Compelling Clarity: PTO Director Explains Compelling Merits Test

US Patent & Trademark Office (PTO) Director Katherine K. Vidal issued a precedential opinion clarifying the standard under which the Patent Trial &…
Article
Ask Lexy

McDermott Will & Emery | USA | 2 Mar 2023

Little Weight Given to Conclusory Expert Declaration That Repeats IPR Petition Verbatim

The US Patent & Trademark Office Director affirmed and designated as precedential a Patent Trial & Appeal Board (Board) decision denying institution…
Article
Ask Lexy

McDermott Will & Emery | USA | 12 Jan 2023

Contingent Statement Doesn’t Unequivocally Abandon Defense of Challenged Claims

The Director of the US Patent & Trademark Office (PTO) initiated a sua sponte review of the Patent Trial & Appeal Board’s (Board) adverse judgments…
Previous page 1 2 3 ...