Refine your search
1,383 results found
McDermott Will & Emery | USA | 17 Aug 2023
New Claim Construction in Patent Owner’s Post-Initiation IPR Response? Sure, Charge Away
Addressing the issue of new claim constructions presented by a patent owner after the institution of inter partes review (IPR) proceedings, the US…
McDermott Will & Emery | USA | 18 May 2023
Pending Appeal Does Not Divest Board of Statutory Authority to Institute IPRs
In a case involving sua sponte review, the Director of the US Patent & Trademark Office (PTO) vacated an inter partes review (IPR) decision denying…
Davidson Berquist Jackson + Gowdey LLP | Japan, USA | 24 Apr 2023
特許侵害主張に対する効果的な防御 - チュートリアル
特許侵害主張に対する防御は、大学や法科大学院では教えられていません。代わりに、特許侵害主張に対する防御は経験によって学習されます。言い換えれば、ほとんどの場合、より上級の知…
Duane Morris LLP | USA | 13 Apr 2023
Finding Needles in a Haystack and Driving Down One-Way Streets: Recent Developments in the Application of Estoppel in Patent Proceedings
Inter partes review (IPR) before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) presents an alternative and more expedient forum for a petitioner to…
McDermott Will & Emery | USA | 13 Apr 2023
Console Yourself: Patent Owner Bears IPR Estoppel Burden
Addressing for the first time the standard and burden of proof for the “reasonably could have raised” requirement for inter partes review (IPR)…
McDermott Will & Emery | USA | 23 Mar 2023
No One Likes a Sore Winner: IPR Prevailing Party Can’t Appeal
Reaffirming precedent, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reiterated the rule that the prevailing party in an inter partes review (IPR)…
McDermott Will & Emery | USA | 23 Mar 2023
Show Your Work: PTO Director’s Procedure for Issuing Instructions Is Reviewable
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s finding under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) that the substance…
McDermott Will & Emery | USA | 9 Mar 2023
Compelling Clarity: PTO Director Explains Compelling Merits Test
US Patent & Trademark Office (PTO) Director Katherine K. Vidal issued a precedential opinion clarifying the standard under which the Patent Trial &…
McDermott Will & Emery | USA | 2 Mar 2023
Little Weight Given to Conclusory Expert Declaration That Repeats IPR Petition Verbatim
The US Patent & Trademark Office Director affirmed and designated as precedential a Patent Trial & Appeal Board (Board) decision denying institution…
McDermott Will & Emery | USA | 12 Jan 2023
Contingent Statement Doesn’t Unequivocally Abandon Defense of Challenged Claims
The Director of the US Patent & Trademark Office (PTO) initiated a sua sponte review of the Patent Trial & Appeal Board’s (Board) adverse judgments…
