We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 9,935

Project Waltz - the last (and only) waltz for Reasonable Expectations?
  • Charles Russell Speechlys
  • United Kingdom
  • August 18 2017

Reasonable Expectations are no more. In IBM and Dalgleish the Court of Appeal overturned the High Court decision which established the principle of


Court of appeal re-examines the level of damages a claimant should be awarded
  • Hugh James Solicitors
  • United Kingdom
  • August 17 2017

The Court of Appeal has reconsidered the correct test to be used when assessing the level of damages due to a claimant after a firm of solicitors had


Could ministers now be forced to disclose the content of their ministerial diaries?
  • Ashfords LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • August 16 2017

On 24 May 2017, the Court of Appeal agreed that former Conservative health secretary Andrew Lansley's Ministerial Diary should be disclosed under the


High Court decision illustrates the need to be sure of your ground before terminating for repudiatory breach
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • August 16 2017

In a recent decision, the High Court found that a claimant's letter purporting to terminate a contract for the defendant's repudiatory breach could


Standard For Acquired Distinctiveness For Three-Dimensional Shapes Clarified
  • Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu PC
  • United Kingdom
  • August 16 2017

The UK Court of Appeal recently dismissed Societé des produits Nestlé SA’s (Nestlé) appeal of a High Court decision that its three-dimensional


Early settlement offers and costs consequences
  • Anthony Gold Solicitors
  • United Kingdom
  • August 16 2017

It is not uncommon for insurers to make offers to entice claimants into early settlement, especially in cases of substantial value, where the stress


Court of Appeal confirms Part 36 costs consequences in new ruling
  • Anthony Gold Solicitors
  • United Kingdom
  • August 15 2017

The Court of Appeal has ruled that a district judge was wrong in not applying the usual costs consequences to a Claimant’s late acceptance of a


Limitation lies in wait for languishing lender claims
  • Wright Hassall LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • August 15 2017

A recent Court of Appeal case highlights the need to bring claims in professional negligence in good time, this time in the context of lender claims


Softer Approach On Pensions Changes Restores Employer's Trust And Confidence
  • Burness Paull LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • August 15 2017

In the space of a week, the Court of Appeal has ruled in favour of 2 household names, IBM and the BBC, in judgments about the good faith duties owed


Trustee Quarterly Review - August 2017
  • Mayer Brown LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • August 14 2017

The Supreme Court has ruled that paragraph 18 of Schedule 9 to the Equality Act 2010 ("paragraph 18") is incompatible with EU law and must be