We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 619

Supreme Court "Expresses" Unanimous View That Credit Card Disclosure Rules Regulate Speech
  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • USA
  • April 3 2017

On March 29, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a New York law restricting the way merchants may communicate prices to their customers regulates


Impending New York Regulation Discouraging Payment By Direct Deposit And Debit Card Struck Down
  • Fisher Phillips
  • USA
  • February 17 2017

Yesterday, the New York Industrial Board of Appeals struck down a regulation adopted by the New York Department of Labor (NYDOL) which sought to


NY Dept. of Labor Proposes Major Changes to Wage Regulations
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • USA
  • November 1 2016

In New York, a large number of wage and hour requirements are statutorily codified in the Labor Law. Many others requirements, however, are set forth


NY Makes Significant Changes to Employers’ Use of Direct Deposit and Payroll Cards
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • USA
  • September 30 2016

The New York State Department of Labor (NYSDOL) recently finalized a new rule that significantly changes how employers pay their employees through


NYSE Clarifies Position That Amendment of Equity Incentive Plan to Allow Maximum Tax Withholding Is Not a Material Amendment
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • August 24 2016

Since FASB amended Accounting rules to give companies the flexibility to withhold taxes from stock plan vestingexercise at a rate above the minimum


Bankruptcy Court holds that secured creditors can be “crammed down” with below-market rate replacement notes
  • Ropes & Gray LLP
  • USA
  • September 2 2014

On August 26, 2014, in the case In re MPM Silicones, LLC, Case No. 14-22503 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.) ("Momentive"), the United States Bankruptcy Court for


Bankruptcy court finds some repo participants are not SIPA “customers”
  • Alston & Bird LLP
  • USA
  • June 28 2013

On June 25, 2013, the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the "Court") issued a memorandum decision in the Lehman Brothers SIPA


In re Hostess Brands, Inc.: Southern District of New York Bankruptcy Court refuses to send cash collateral dispute to arbitration
  • Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP
  • USA
  • February 4 2013

On January 7, 2013, the Judge Robert D. Drain of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York held that a dispute


Participants in ERISA plans were not Madoff customers
  • Chadbourne & Parke LLP
  • USA
  • October 15 2012

A federal district court judge in New York has delivered bad news to participants in ERISA-regulated plans that invested with Bernard Madoff when the court concluded that the individual participants were not “customers” of the Madoff funds within the meaning of the Securities Investor Protection Act (“SIPA”


Bill criminalizing sales tax skimming software passed by Florida legislature New York bill would do the same
  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • USA
  • April 2 2012

The sale, possession or use of software designed to eliminate (or "zap") cash sales from a retailer's electronic records in order to skim sales tax will be subject to criminal penalties in Florida under a bill passed by the legislature