Refine your search
657 results found
Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. | USA | 14 Mar 2023
Connecticut Federal District Court Follows Majority Rule on Insurance Policy Anti-Assignment Clauses
A recent decision by the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut further confirms that Connecticut courts follow the majority…
Burges Salmon LLP | United Kingdom | 1 Mar 2023
When is a planning condition a condition precedent?
This is a question which has been considered by the Courts on numerous occasions, but still causes contention. In a recent appeal decision (reference…
Hogan Lovells | USA | 12 Apr 2019
The Curse of Shoeless Joe Continues: TTAB Finds White Sox Fan Lacked Bona Fide Intent-To-Use
For any baseball fans already preparing to capitalize when their favorite team wins their next World Series game, you may strike out before getting up…
McMillan LLP | Canada | 11 Mar 2019
Supreme Court of Canada Likely to Consider PostTermination Bonus Entitlements
The Supreme Court of Canada will soon have an opportunity to provide useful clarity on employers' ability to contractually bar employees from…
Lapointe Rosenstein Marchand Melançon LLP | Canada | 18 Dec 2018
Will a franchisee's rescission claim stay or will it go? Mandatory mediation may result in stay of proceedings
It has become common practice to include alternative dispute resolution (ADR) provisions in franchise agreements. A recent decision by the Ontario Court of Appeal serves as a stark reminder to franchisors to ensure that ADR provisions contained in a franchise agreement are properly drafted so that the commencement of disputes thereunder triggers the running of the applicable limitation period.
Bilzin Sumberg | USA | 10 Dec 2018
New York High Court Rules on Statute of Limitations
Over the last several years, we have posted several times about whether the statute of limitations bars remedies against lenders (and sometimes…
BDO LLP | India | 23 Nov 2018
Strict interpretation of exemption notifications under tax laws
The Supreme Court recently pronounced a landmark judgment on the question of taxpayers' eligibility to receive tax exemptions when more than one interpretation is possible – namely, one in favour of the taxpayer and the other in favour of the tax authority. The court concluded that where a tax exemption must be interpreted, the tax authority will be given the benefit of the doubt, unlike in......
Asters | Ukraine | 20 Nov 2018
Due Diligence of Renewable Energy Projects
According to the official statistics of the National Commission which performs state regulation in the energy sector and utilities 160,1 MW of…
Troutman Pepper | USA | 5 Nov 2018
Virginia Supreme Court Clarifies Statute of Limitations for Mortgagor Contract Claims
In a victory for mortgage lenders and servicers, the Virginia Supreme Court held on September 27 that Virginia’s five-year statute of limitations for…
WeirFoulds LLP | Canada | 29 Oct 2018
All that glisters is not tolled, but is the story fully told?
On October 10th, 2018 the Ontario Court of Appeal released its decision dismissing the appeal in the case of National Money Mart Company v 24 Gold…
