We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-8 of 8

Interesting Angles on the DOL’s Fiduciary Rule 24
  • Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
  • USA
  • October 20 2016

This is my twenty-fourth article covering interesting observations about the fiduciary rule and exemptions. The DOL’s fiduciary “package” consists of


Selection and monitoring of target date funds
  • Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
  • USA
  • October 7 2013

As I review investment policy statements for participant-directed plans, I see a number of common deficiencies. This email is about one of


Service provider disclosures: the impact on plan sponsors
  • Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
  • USA
  • October 5 2011

April 1, 2012, is a significant date for plan sponsors and their plan committees


Fee disclosure compliance delayed
  • Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
  • USA
  • August 2 2011

The U.S. Department of Labor announced a three month delay in the compliance date for the service provider fee disclosure regulation (the 408(b)(2) regulation


An unexpected and painful lesson for an investment adviser
  • Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
  • USA
  • August 2 2011

In our reviews of investment advisory agreements for retirement plans, we are often disappointed by the lack of clarity about the extent of the fiduciary responsibilities being accepted by the advisers


Fee disclosure compliance delayed
  • Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
  • USA
  • July 20 2011

Last week, the U.S. Department of Labor announced a three-month delay in the compliance date for the service provider fee disclosure regulation (the 408(b)(2) regulation



Fred Reish
  • Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP