We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-10 of 52

Some ITC Decisions Create Collateral Estoppel
  • Jones Day
  • USA
  • June 8 2018

While patent decisions from the ITC do not have collateral estoppel effects on later district court cases, other ITC decisions may create collateral


Will the ITC Become a New Forum for Fast-Track Trade Secret Lawsuits?
  • Fenwick & West LLP
  • USA
  • April 5 2018

In a case of first impression, Manitowoc Cranes v. Sany America, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin held that an


ITC finding of trade secret misappropriation precludes party from relitigating issue in court, WI federal court rules
  • Dentons
  • USA
  • February 6 2018

In a recent ruling in a case of first impression, Manitowoc Cranes LLC v. Sany America Inc., Case Nos. 13-cv-677 & 15-cv-647 (E.D. Wisc. Dec. 11


Sany Heavy Industry v. ITC: Federal Circuit Affirms 10-Year Exclusion Order for Misappropriated Trade Secrets
  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • USA
  • October 14 2016

On October 11, 2016, the Federal Circuit affirmed the ITC’s finding of violation and issuance of a 10-year limited exclusion order barring the


Well known yes, similar no: Daimler finds no joy on appeal (again)
  • James & Wells
  • New Zealand
  • October 1 2015

In Daimler AG v Sany Group Company Limited 2015 NZCA 418, the Court of Appeal has confirmed an earlier decision by the High Court to accept Sany's


前车之鉴后事之师如何通过美国外国投资委员会审查
  • DeHeng Law Offices
  • USA, China
  • November 26 2014

近期并购界热议的三一重工诉美国总统奥巴马案再度引起各方对美国投资审查制度的关注


Key implications of the recent Ralls decision
  • Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP
  • USA
  • August 6 2014

On July 15, 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ("DC Circuit") issued a decision in Ralls Corporation v. Committee


American suspicions could deter Chinese investment
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • USA, China
  • July 17 2013

Chinese officials have long complained about American national security reviews, insisting they are an obstacle to Chinese investment in the United


Ralls case affirms President’s broad CFIUS authority
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA, China
  • March 14 2013

On February 22, 2013, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed all but one claim in a lawsuit filed by Chinese-owned Ralls


President Obama orders Chinese-owned corporation to divest from wind farm in Oregon
  • King & Spalding LLP
  • USA, China
  • November 1 2012

On September 28, 2012, President Obama blocked Ralls Corporation from acquiring ownership of four wind farm companies in Oregon near a U.S. naval weapons systems training facility due to national security concerns.