We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results:1-10 of 96

Ohio Supreme Court issues narrow divided opinion about oil gas well permits
  • Kegler Brown Hill + Ritter
  • USA
  • February 19 2015

In a long-awaited decision, the Ohio Supreme Court on February 17, 2015, held that the comprehensive oil and gas well permitting system established

Ohio Supreme Court upholds Power Siting Board order approving Champaign County wind farm
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • March 6 2012

The Supreme Court of Ohio upheld an order issued by the Ohio Power Siting Board approving the application of Buckeye Wind LLC to construct and operate a 126 megawatt wind farm in Champaign County.

Claims for reimbursement should be made before initiation of lawsuit
  • Jorden Burt LLP
  • USA
  • May 17 2011

The Ohio Supreme Court recently held that where an insured never submitted a claim for reimbursement to his auto insurer, he had no standing to sue for breach of contract for the insurer's refusal to pay.

Ohio Supreme Court issues important decision on coverage for intentional acts
  • Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
  • USA
  • March 2 2011

On December 30, 2010, the Ohio Supreme Court issued a significant decision which clarified the ever-changing law on coverage for intentional acts.

Ohio Supreme Court looks at power siting board jurisdiction
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • January 20 2011

On December 1, 2010, the Ohio Supreme Court issued a 5-1 decision reversing and remanding an Ohio Power Siting Board (OPSB) decision granting the Middletown Coke Company a certificate to construct a cogeneration facility that will produce both purified coal (coke) and more than 50 MW of electricity.

Telecom privacy news
  • Arent Fox LLP
  • USA
  • January 10 2011

Citing US Supreme Court precedent, the California Supreme Court has determined that police can search a mobile phone if it is found on a person who is taken into police custody.

Ohio Supreme Court affirms denial of real estate tax exemption for dialysis center
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • USA
  • November 11 2010

The Ohio Supreme Court recently affirmed the denial of a charitable-use exemption for a dialysis center by the Ohio Board of Tax Appeals.

Ohio Supreme Court decides when a local board of health rules a license application is not complete, the landfill cannot appeal that decision
  • Frost Brown Todd LLC
  • USA
  • July 8 2010

No matter how much we try to re-use, re-cycle, and conserve, landfills will be necessary for many years to come.

Statute precludes property owner’s liability for “take home” asbestos exposure claim
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • June 15 2010

In a 5-1 decision the Ohio Supreme Court held that a premises owner is not liable in tort for claims arising from asbestos exposure originating from asbestos on the owner’s property, unless the exposure occurred at the owner’s property.

Ohio Supreme Court holds attorneys fees derived from punitive damage award are insurable
  • Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
  • USA
  • May 12 2010

The Ohio Supreme Court held on May 4, 2010 that attorneys' fees awarded as a result of a judgment for punitive damages are insurable under an automobile policy.