Search
Refine your search
1,492 results found
SandRun Risk | USA | 26 Apr 2021
The Ohio Supreme Court Agrees to Answer Certified Questions on COVID-19 Property Damage
The Ohio Supreme Court has agreed to answer certified questions of law on COVID-19 property damage. The answers to these questions will have a…
Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP | USA | 23 Apr 2021
Ohio Court of Appeals Addresses Adverse Possession of Minerals Among Co-Tenants
The 7th District Court of Appeals in Ohio recently addressed what elements a co-tenant must satisfy to adversely possess a severed oil and gas…
Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP | USA | 21 Apr 2021
Ohio Supreme Court To Hear Case Involving Insurance Coverage For COVID-19 Losses
In a 4-3 decision, the Ohio Supreme Court has recently agreed to answer a question involving insurance coverage for COVID-19 related losses. The Ohio…
Brouse McDowell | USA | 16 Feb 2021
RE&C In Review: Ohio Supreme Court Finds that Purchase Price in "Drop and Swap" Transactions May Establish Tax Value of Real Estate
When parties desire to buy and sell real estate, they sometimes will utilize what is known as a “drop and swap” transaction. In a “drop and swap”…
Thompson Hine LLP | USA | 14 Dec 2020
“You” Really Means “You”: Ohio Supreme Court Reaffirms Contract Interpretation Principles for Cognovit Notes
Last month, the Supreme Court of Ohio issued an opinion that reaffirmed several legal principles of contract interpretation, construing the word “you”…
Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP | USA | 10 Dec 2020
Supreme Court of Ohio Construe’s State’s Saltwater Injection Well Permitting Scheme
In a recent mandamus action, the Supreme Court of Ohio had the opportunity to construe Ohio’s saltwater injection well permitting scheme. See State ex…
Brouse McDowell | USA | 3 Dec 2020
Client Alert: Ohio Supreme Court Issues Decision in West v. Bode Concerning Application of Marketable Title Act to Severed Mineral Interests
On December 2, 2020, the Ohio Supreme Court issued its decision in West v. Bode, 2020-Ohio-5473, concerning whether the Marketable Title Act (MTA)…
Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP | USA | 6 Nov 2020
Ohio Supreme Court Rejects Look-Through Sourcing for Sale of Customer Contracts
The Ohio Supreme Court held that under the Commercial Activity Tax (“CAT”), Defender Security Company’s (“Taxpayer”) gross receipts from selling alarm…
Frost Brown Todd LLC | USA | 4 Nov 2020
Crum v. Yoder: No, the DMA Does Not Require You to Serve Notice of Abandonment on Your Own Address
Ohio’s oil and gas community keenly awaits the Ohio Supreme Court’s decisions in Gerrity v. Chervenak and other related cases for (hopefully)…
Brouse McDowell | USA | 13 Aug 2020
Client Alert: Ohio Supreme Court to Decide Applicability of Marketable Title Act to Mineral Interests
The Ohio Supreme Court will finally decide the issue of whether the Marketable Title Act (MTA) can operate independent of the Dormant Mineral Act…
