We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results:1-10 of 188

IP recordals: An administrative burden for in-house teams
  • Novagraaf
  • United Kingdom, Global
  • February 15 2017

The transfer of IP ownership due on the acquisition of a brand or business can be a time-consuming and costly exercise. However, there are steps that

Finding the perfect balance: golden rules for cost-effective outsourcing
  • VO Patents & Trademarks
  • Netherlands
  • October 28 2014

In-house counsel are usually best placed to protect and capitalise on a business's intellectual property. But how can quality be guaranteed in busy

Privilege in IP litigation
  • Shepherd and Wedderburn LLP
  • United Kingdom, European Union
  • January 20 2011

A recent spate of cases before the UK and European Courts re-considering the scope of privilege are of interest to businesses with valuable IP rights.

Missing the mark: the top 10 trademark mistakes in advertising campaigns
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • October 31 2008

Although trademarks can be the crown jewels of a company's assets, even the most talented marketing specialists and most promising corporate executives can share fundamental misunderstandings about the creation, protection, and enforcement of trademarks.

Trade mark owners need to be vigilant under new trade mark rules
  • Shepherd and Wedderburn LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • August 13 2008

The United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office (UK IPO) has published the amended Trade Mark Rules.

Ground-breaking ruling on Registered Community Designs
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • United Kingdom
  • October 31 2007

In the first case to be heard on Registered Community Designs in the UK Court of Appeal, the Court has ruled on the scope and interpretation of the monopoly in these novel and important intellectual property rights.

Parameters of the advice-of-counsel defense: In Re Echostar Communications Corporation, 448 F.3d 1294 (Fed. Cir. 2006)
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • USA
  • October 5 2007

EchoStar Communications Corporation (and various related entities, collectively “EchoStar”) was sued for patent infringement by TiVo.