We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 142

District Court Excludes Evidence of Lost Profits Where Inventor Did Not Make Products That Practiced the Patent Even Though a Related Corporation Did
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • August 8 2016

In this patent infringement action, the defendants filed a motion in limine to exclude evidence of any claimed lost profits damages alleged by the


Worth Covering: News, Tips, and Thoughts for Professional Liability Carriers
  • FisherBroyles LLP
  • USA
  • July 20 2016

We are very pleased to provide you with the inaugural issue of our newsletter tailored to the professional liability insurance industry. The focus of


Contention discovery requests in Texas: punting in the first quarter could lead to disaster in the fourth
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • November 10 2015

It happens every day: one litigant serves discovery requests on another, asking the latter to "identify every fact" or "explain every basis" for the


Fujitsu recalls notebook battery packs
  • Penningtons Manches LLP
  • United Kingdom, Japan
  • September 21 2015

Fujitsu, the Japanese multinational technology company, has issued a voluntary product recall notice for certain battery packs used in its notebook


Decision granting Petitioner page extension IPR2014-00781
  • Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
  • USA
  • April 24 2015

In light of Director Lee’s Posting announcing upcoming changes to PTAB rules, the Board may permit petitioners 25 pages, instead of 15, to reply to a


October 2014 retail patent litigation report
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • February 3 2015

The trolls continued the fourth quarter the way they ended the third quiet. Repeat filers included Hawk Technology, Interface IP and Phoenix


Illinois Savings Clause revives third party claims
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • December 3 2014

Judge Holderman denied defendants' (collectively "Tellabs") Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) motion to dismiss two Fujitsu entities' trade secret and other


Fujitsu v. Tellabs: the district court orders additional sanctions for Fujitsu's continued "contemptuous conduct"
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • October 20 2014

Following the district court's previous order granting a motion to compel against Fujitsu, and Fujitsu's unsuccessful appeal to the Federal Circuit


Fujitsu v. Tellabs: Fujitsu appeal's decision on motion to compel and, after it loses on appeal, district court orders a civil penalty which doubles each day documents are not produced
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • October 15 2014

In this patent infringement action, the district court granted a motion to compel filed by Tellabs against Fujitsu. Fujitsu then filed a petition for


Northern District Court of Illinois contemplates holding asserted patent unenforceable based on breach of FRAND commitment
  • King & Spalding LLP
  • USA
  • August 28 2014

On July 23, 2014, Judge James Holderman issued an Order to Show Cause and Jury Verdict in Fujitsu v. Tellabs, Consolidated C.A. Nos. 1:09-cv-04530