We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-10 of 861

Reading the Tea Leaves: Pleading Standing for Statutory Violation Claims Following the Supreme Court’s Denial of Certiorari in Spokeo II
  • Hausfeld LLP
  • USA
  • February 16 2018

In the nearly two years since the Supreme Court decision in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, lower courts and litigants have struggled with differing


The Spokeo Chronicles: FCRA Criminal Background Pre-Adverse Action Claim Dismissed for Lack of Standing
  • Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
  • USA
  • January 24 2018

On December 21, 2017, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in Moore v. Rite Aid Headquarters Corp., 2:13-cv-01515


NJ Fed. Court Dismisses Technical FACTA Violation Putative Class Action Citing Spokeo
  • Maurice Wutscher LLP
  • USA
  • July 19 2017

The U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey recently concluded that a putative class representative did not have standing under Spokeo to


Two Recent Appellate Decisions Illustrate Divergent Approaches To Spokeo
  • Mayer Brown
  • USA
  • March 27 2017

Hundreds of lower courts have interpreted and applied the Supreme Court’s decision in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins over the past ten months. We will provide


California's Automatic Renewal Law: three recent decisions, and what they mean for businesses
  • DLA Piper
  • USA
  • March 16 2017

Yet another trial court has decided the question of whether California's Automatic Renewal Law (ARL) provides a private right of action. The answer is a resounding no. So where does this leave the state of lawsuits for automatically renewing plans for goods and services in California?


Chancery Court explains standing for fiduciary claims when a stockholder is squeezed out
  • K&L Gates
  • USA
  • January 23 2017

In I.A.T.S.E. Local No. One Pension Fund v. General Electric Company, et al., No. 11893-VCG (Del. Ch. Ct. December 6, 2016), the Delaware Court of


Privacy & Cybersecurity Update September 2016
  • Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP
  • USA, European Union
  • October 3 2016

In this edition of our Privacy & Cybersecurity Update, we examine the Sixth Circuit's decision to allow injury-in-fact to be established by alleging


Consumer Class Actions in respect of Pricing Disclosure: The Québec Superior Court Refuses to Certify a “Drip Pricing” Class Action in Quebec
  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • Canada
  • August 26 2016

There have been a number of recent class actions commenced in Canada relating to pricing disclosure - and in particular, the alleged practice of


Monthly TCPA Digest - August 2016
  • Mintz
  • USA
  • August 26 2016

In light of the continued compliance and litigation challenges presented by the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), Mintz Levin's TCPA and


Clarity and Confusion: Unpacking the Impact of the Supreme Court’s Recent Class Action Decisions
  • Hausfeld LLP
  • USA
  • August 13 2016

This article will discuss the impact to date of the four class action decisions of the Supreme Court's last Term and the potential impact on