We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 233

U.S. Sanctions Venezuelan Individuals, Including PDVSA Officials
  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • USA, Venezuela
  • July 28 2017

Share The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has recently sanctioned 13 Venezuelan individuals alleged to be


Russia Sanctions and Rosneft: European Court upholds and clarifies Russian oil and gas sanctions
  • Taylor Wessing
  • European Union
  • July 12 2017

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has upheld and clarified the EU’s sanctions against Russia’s oil and gas industry - rejecting a


European Court affirms EU sanctions against Russian company Rosneft
  • NautaDutilh
  • European Union
  • April 5 2017

On 28 March, the Court of Justice of the European Union ('ECJ') held that the sanctions imposed by the European Union ('EU') against Rosneft, a


EU Rosneft judgment clarifies bank transfers are not sanctioned "financial assistance"
  • White & Case LLP
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • March 29 2017

On 28 March 2017, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its judgment1 in a case referred by the UK High Court in which Rosneft


OW Bunkers: owners stung by double payment
  • Wikborg Rein
  • United Kingdom
  • August 24 2016

On May 11 2016, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the long-running OW Bunkers case. The decision is unlikely to be welcomed by owners


US and EU Dissuade Banks from Participating in Russian Bond Offering
  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • European Union, Russia, USA
  • May 18 2016

US and EU regulators have warned banks not to participate in a proposed $3 billion, 10-year Russia Eurobond offering, even if participation will not


Supreme Court rules in “most spectacular legal shipping imbroglio this century” - Difficulties remain with retention of title clauses
  • CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • May 12 2016

In a case described by Lloyd’s List as “the most spectacular shipping legal imbroglio of the century”, the Supreme Court has confirmed that a bunker


Res Cogitans: bunker supply contracts
  • Kennedys Law LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • November 27 2015

Court of Appeal rules that OW Bunker is entitled to payment for bunkers supplied on the basis that the contract was a hybrid contract to which


Court of Appeal: bunker suppliers who could not transfer property in bunkers entitled to price
  • Ince & Co LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • October 23 2015

In a judgment handed down on 22 October 2015, the Court of Appeal has upheld the Commercial Court decision of 14 July 2015 (see link to our article


“Res cogitans”
  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • September 29 2015

On 17 September 2015, the Court of Appeal (Lord Justices Moore-Bick, Longmore and McCombe) heard Owners' appeal of the decision of Mr Justice Males