AND	term1 AND term2	Both terms must be included
OR	term1 OR term2	Either term
NOT	term1 NOT term2	term2 must not appear
""	"term1 term2"	Exact match
()	term1 AND (term2 OR term3)	Grouping terms
?	withdr?w	Single letter wildcard (withdraw, withdrew)
*	withdr*	Multiple letter wildcard (withdraw, withdrawn, withdrawing)
"..."~n	"term1 term2"~n	Proximity (term1 within n words of term2)

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Jurisdiction

Work area

Firm name

Date from

Date to

Results:1-10 of 4,256

Our Own Patent Law Oddities

Harness, Dickey & Pierce, PLC
USA
January 18 2019

For the fifty years between 1940 and 1990, The St. Louis Post Dispatch had a section in its comics pages titled “Our Own Oddities” that featured

Federal Circuit Rules On Standing To Appeal From PTAB In The Hatch-Waxman Context, And Addresses Obviousness Challenges To Prodrug Patents

King & Spalding LLP
USA
January 15 2019

On January 11, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a precedential opinion affirming the decision of the Patent Trial and

IPR Art Simultaneously Qualifying as Known or Used Subject to Estoppel

Ropes & Gray LLP
USA
January 14 2019

Post SAS, there are fewer exceptions to IPR estoppel. Indeed, the absence of partial institutions has led to many courts finding the “reasonably

Patentability in Russia

PETOŠEVIĆ
Russia, Global
January 8 2019

An overview of patentability in Russia

Two Asserted Lantus Patents CancelledCommercial Success Evidence Insufficient Because of Blocking Patents

Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, PC
USA
January 8 2019

On December 12, 2018, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Appeal Board (PTAB) ruled in favor of Mylan in its inter partes review (IPR) proceedings. It

Recent Changes at the PTAB Appear to Benefit Patent Owners

Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
USA
December 23 2018

Since the America Invents Act created new post-grant review proceedings, such as inter partes reviews (IPRs), the Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Rule 36 Judgment May Support Finding of Collateral Estoppel

Jones Day
USA
December 21 2018

The Federal Circuit recently affirmed final written decisions in two inter partes reviews by holding that the patent owner was collaterally estopped

Supreme Administrative Court finds “same problem” is key to combining prior art evidence

IAM
Taiwan
December 19 2018

On 1 November 2018, Taiwan’s Supreme Administrative Court rendered a judgment on appeal (Pan Zi, 647) in which it found that “the substantive same

Collateral Estoppel is Allowed to Apply to Rule 36 Affirmances of the PTAB

Haynes and Boone LLP
USA
December 13 2018

The Federal Circuit has affirmed that a Rule 36 judgment may serve as a basis for collateral estoppel in Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)

In IPR, a Picture is Worth a Thousand Words or Worse than Worthless

Banner & Witcoff Ltd
USA
December 12 2018

Lawyers experienced in patent litigation know that a picture, well Explained, can be worth a thousand words. Juries and judges learn best when

Search techniques

Current Search

Refine

Content type

Tags