We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results:1-10 of 15

Repackaging and re-applying registered trade marks to genuine products to comply with Australian plain packaging laws is not trade mark infringement
  • Gadens
  • Australia
  • October 12 2016

The Full Federal Court's decision in Scandinavian Tobacco Group Eersel BV v Trojan Trading Company Pty Ltd provides guidance on the scope of the

Tobacco repackaging appeal runs out of puff
  • The Commercial Bar Association of Victoria
  • Australia
  • August 25 2016

The appellants (STG) manufacture and sell cigars under various marks, including the marks in suit. Trojan imported and retailed genuine STG cigars in

Full Federal Court confirms limitation of trade mark rights with respect to repackaging of goods by third parties
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • Australia
  • July 18 2016

The decision of the Full Federal Court in Scandinavian Tobacco Group v Trojan Trading Company, clarifies that trade mark rights cannot be relied upon

STG v Trojan: protecting trade mark rights in the context of parallel importation
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • Australia
  • April 8 2016

In the recent decision in Scandinavian Tobacco Group Eersel BV v Trojan Trading Company Pty Ltd 2016 FCAFC 91 (STG v Trojan), the Full Federal

Trade mark decision a threat to packaging and quality control
  • Johnson Winter & Slattery
  • Australia
  • November 30 2015

In a decision that may have wider implications for control of trade marks and packaging, the Scandinavian Tobacco Group (STG)1 has failed in a claim

Rachelle Downie
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP

Kevin Lynch
  • Johnson Winter & Slattery