We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 425

PTO’s Rehearing Petition in Bosch: Signaling Future Rulemaking After Aqua Products?
  • Jones Day
  • USA
  • February 13 2018

On February 5, 2018, the PTO filed a petition for rehearing of Bosch Auto. Serv. Sol’ns, LLC v. Matal, 878 F.3d 1027 (Fed. Cir., Dec. 22, 2017). The


High Court takes firm line with dishonest claimant and awards damages for deceit
  • Penningtons Manches LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • February 12 2018

The delicate balance between allowing genuinely injured claimants to recover damages for their injuries and financial losses through personal injury


Patent Prosecutors Beware: Earlier Publication Anticipates Broad Claims of Continuing Application
  • Jones Day
  • USA
  • February 12 2018

A recent written decision by the PTAB in connection with an inter partes review (IPR) proceeding is a reminder to patent prosecutors to carefully


Compensatory damages principles in civil- and common-law jurisdictions requirements, underlying principles and limits
  • White & Case LLP
  • France
  • February 9 2018

Compensatory damages, as the name indicates, are intended to compensate a claimant for losses suffered as a result of the other party’s (wrongful


Civil Fraud - Standard of Proof
  • Anthony Gold Solicitors
  • United Kingdom
  • February 7 2018

Many are aware of the differing standards of proof between civil and criminal matters. In criminal prosecutions, the case has to be proven beyond


Section 6 Civil Liability (Third Party Claims Against Insurers) Act 2017 (NSW) - does not change the onus of proof for out of time claims
  • Barry.Nilsson. Lawyers
  • Australia
  • February 1 2018

Whether the onus is on the claimant or the insurer to prove that a proposed claim is within time or out of time for leave to bring proceedings under


The Ninth Circuit’s Decision In In Re Hyundai Underscores The Challenges Of Certifying Nationwide Classes
  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • USA
  • February 1 2018

Last week, a split Ninth Circuit panel in In re Hyundai and Kia Fuel Economy Litigation vacated the certification of a nationwide class for


Manual handling obligations: Court of Appeal ruling underlines that employers need only consider ‘real’ risks to staff
  • Penningtons Manches LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • January 29 2018

The Court of Appeal has given judgment in Stewart (now White) v Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust 2017 EWCA Civ 2091. In this case, the claimant was


Challenger Bears Burden of Proof for Unpatentability of Proposed Amended Claims
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • January 25 2018

In an opinion addressing the burden of proof for unpatentability for a proposed amended claim in an inter partes review (IPR), the US Court of


To Be Anticipatory, Reference Must Disclose All Claim Elements Arranged as in Claim
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • January 25 2018

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision that a patent challenger at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) must prove