We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-10 of 421

Burden Clarification To Expand PTAB Discovery for RPIPrivity Disputes?
  • Ropes & Gray LLP
  • USA
  • September 11 2018

On the heels of Applications in Internet Time, LLC v. RPX Corporation, the Federal Circuit once again finds itself considering a PTAB RPIPrivity


Wrongful termination claims and the NLRB’s burden of proof
  • Baker McKenzie
  • USA
  • August 21 2018

A recent decision by the National Labor Relations Board left experienced labor practitioners scratching their heads. In Tschiggfrie Properties Ltd. v


PTAB Issues Fourth Installment Of Its Motion To Amend Study
  • Jones Day
  • USA
  • August 14 2018

On Monday, the PTAB issued its fourth installment of its ongoing motion to amend study, providing details on motions to amend filed and decided


Workplace Investigation Alert: Reconsidering Reprisals
  • Rubin Thomlinson LLP
  • USA, Canada
  • July 24 2018

Share this post: Special note to Ontario and BC readers: If this subject is of interest to you, you may wish attend one of our related workshops. Some


Cartel immunity and leniency programmes in Germany
  • HAVER & MAILÄNDER
  • Germany, Global
  • July 19 2018

A structured guide to cartel immunity and leniency programmes in Germany


Key California Employment Law Cases: May 2018
  • Payne & Fears LLP
  • USA
  • July 13 2018

This month’s key California employment law cases are two decisions from the California Court of Appea


PTAB Designates Five Decisions as Informative
  • Jones Day
  • USA
  • July 11 2018

On July 10, 2018, the PTAB announced the designation the following five decisions as informative: Colas Sols. Inc. v. Blacklidge Emulsions, Inc., Case


Federal Circuit Remands Decision on Motion to Amend to Board to Apply and Interpret Aqua Products and SAS Institute
  • Marshall Gerstein & Borun LLP
  • USA
  • June 26 2018

The Federal Circuit’s recent decision in Sirona Dental Systems GMBH v. Institut Straumann AG, Appeals 2017-1341, 2017-1403 (Fed. Cir. June 19, 2018)


The Well-known Character does not Extend to Other Marks Used Together with the Famous Mark
  • Marval O'Farrell & Mairal
  • USA
  • June 12 2018

On May 16, 2017 Division 3 of the Federal Court of Appeals in Civil and Commercial Matters, in re “Nike Argentina S.R.L. V. Pace, Susana” (Case No


PTAB Provides Guidance on Motion to Amend Practice
  • Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC
  • USA
  • June 12 2018

In Western Digital Corp v. SPEX Tech, the PTAB provides guidance on motion to amend practice in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings at the Patent