We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-10 of 111

Tribunals must not forget range of reasonable responses test
  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • September 20 2011

The Employment Appeal Tribunal has delivered a “back to basics” reminder in a decision involving a part-time community midwife who also held an part-time administrative job with another employer.


Post settlement surveillance a warning!
  • RPC
  • United Kingdom
  • May 26 2011

In 2008 Mr Noble received damages totalling £3,397,000 for personal injuries sustained in a road traffic accident in 2003.


An ethical dilemma
  • Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
  • Canada
  • May 25 2011

A recent decision of the Federal Court deals with the ethical dilemma that counsel for the plaintiff found themselves in relating to evidence that had been presented to the Court as part of the plaintiff's claim.


Implantable cardiac defibrillators continue to be scrutinized by DOJ
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • USA
  • February 3 2011

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has shown interest in potential fraud linked to hospitals billing Medicare for implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD).


Top ten electronic health record system expectationsrequirements: beyond 'meaningful use'
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • March 31 2010

Much industry attention and hype surrounds the incentive payments made available to providers under the HITECH portion of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 for implementing an Electronic Health Record (EHR) system.


MOJ’s response to consultation: personal injury claims process & case track limits
  • Kennedys Law LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • July 21 2008

The Government has today published the long awaited and overdue response following the lengthy consultation process carried out last year.


MoJ’s response to consultation: personal injury claims process & case track limits
  • Kennedys Law LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • July 21 2008

The Government have today published the long awaited and overdue response following the lengthy consultation process carried out last year.


Anti-markup, gainsharing and physician self-referral issues in the 2009 Fee Schedule Proposed Rule
  • Alston & Bird LLP
  • USA
  • July 10 2008

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) 2009 Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule (“Proposed Rule”) was published in the Federal Register on July 7, 2008.


Susanne Wilkins
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP

Nichola Carter
  • Penningtons Manches LLP