We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-10 of 327

Choose your opinions wisely: The Fair Work Commission clarifies approach to conflicting medical reports
  • Maddocks
  • Australia
  • July 16 2018

In CSL Limited TA CSL Behring v Papaioannou 2018 FWCFB 1005 a Full Bench of the Fair Work Commission (Commission) clarified that it will make an


House Opioid Measure Frenzy Continues
  • Quarles & Brady LLP
  • USA
  • July 16 2018

Over a period of two weeks in June, the House passed several bills aimed at combating the ongoing opioid epidemic. Our summary of the earlier measures


State Telehealth Laws and Medicaid Policies: 50-State Survey Findings
  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • USA
  • July 10 2018

The use of telemedicine services is growing nationwide as providers and payors seek to improve access and better manage patient care, while reducing


A recent case has highlighted the importance of keeping detailed employee records in cases of dismissal.
  • Holding Redlich
  • Australia
  • April 24 2018

On 13 April 2018, in the decision Mr Vijayan Kothandan v Transdev Melbourne Pty Ltd TA Transdev 2018 FWC 2119, the Fair Work Commission


When Medical Opinions Collide
  • K&L Gates
  • Australia
  • February 26 2018

Determining whether an employee is fit to return to work is a common challenge faced by employers. Employers are required to rely on the opinions of


Life sciences & Healthcare in Ukraine - 2017 in Review
  • Kinstellar
  • Ukraine
  • February 2 2018

Establishment of the National Healthcare Service of Ukraine (the "Service")


Obese Employees May Be Protected Under FEHA
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • February 1 2018

In December 2017, the California Court of Appeal published a decision confirming obesity is a protected disability in California if it has a


GC Memorandum 18-02 Suggests a More Sane Approach to Independent Contractors
  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • USA
  • December 18 2017

In GC Memo 18-02, in what may bring some holiday cheer to employers around the country, the newly appointed General Counsel walked back the prior


The weaknesses of evidence based on recollection
  • Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer
  • United Kingdom
  • July 26 2017

Leggatt J (whose promotion to the Court of Appeal has just been announced) today handed down his judgment in the high profile Commercial Court


The Supreme Court concludes there is no need to prove psychiatric illness to establish mental injury: Saadati v. Moorhead
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • Canada
  • July 18 2017

Is a Plaintiff required to prove that they suffer from a recognized psychiatric illness in order to recover for mental injury? The Supreme Court has