We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 470

GC Memorandum 18-02 Suggests a More Sane Approach to Independent Contractors
  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • USA
  • December 18 2017

In GC Memo 18-02, in what may bring some holiday cheer to employers around the country, the newly appointed General Counsel walked back the prior


The weaknesses of evidence based on recollection
  • Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • July 26 2017

Leggatt J (whose promotion to the Court of Appeal has just been announced) today handed down his judgment in the high profile Commercial Court


The Supreme Court concludes there is no need to prove psychiatric illness to establish mental injury: Saadati v. Moorhead
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • Canada
  • July 18 2017

Is a Plaintiff required to prove that they suffer from a recognized psychiatric illness in order to recover for mental injury? The Supreme Court has


The DTSA and Inevitable Disclosure
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • May 30 2017

A recent decision in the Northern District of Illinois gave life to the inevitable disclosure doctrine under the Defend Trade Secrets Act. Inevitable


Ohio Workers’ Compensation: Pre-Existing Conditions and the Right to Participate
  • Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
  • USA
  • May 22 2017

An area of both judicial and legislative focus for many years in the Ohio Workers’ Compensation system concerns the extent to which workers’


Mental Health Awareness Week: issues in the workplace
  • Taylor Vinters LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • May 11 2017

Whilst many physical disabilities are self-evident, ‘invisible’ or ‘hidden’ conditions such as depression are not always as easy for employers to spot


MIECHV: A Minibus Rider
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • May 10 2017

In a recent post we noted that the Maternal, Infant, Early Childhood, Home Visiting (MIECHV) program is one of the many potential riders on the


Avoid Ulcers by Crafting a Well-Reasoned Petition
  • Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, PC
  • USA
  • April 13 2017

Your IPR petition argues that a patent is obviousbut will those arguments even be fully considered? A recent decision in Affordable Drugs VII v


New guidance from UK appeal court on long-term sickness dismissals
  • Ius Laboris
  • United Kingdom
  • March 28 2017

The UK’s Court of Appeal has given some useful new guidance on the vexed question of when an employer can safely dismiss an employee who is on


When Should Appeal Panels 'wait a little longer' Before Confirming a Dismissal in Cases of Long-Term Sickness Absence?
  • Veale Wasbrough Vizards
  • United Kingdom
  • March 24 2017

A recent Court of Appeal case, O'Brien v Bolton St Catherine's Academy, considered the effect of fresh medical evidence adduced at an appeal hearing