We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-10 of 220

2018 Election: Instant Analysis
  • Arent Fox LLP
  • USA
  • November 7 2018

Below is a roundup of headlines that matter and key takeaways from the industries and issues we're following closely. We'll be back later today with


Coal is here to stay - at least for the foreseeable future
  • Hogan Lovells
  • South Africa
  • October 2 2017

One of the things that struck me in a recent business trip to Europe, was the significant increase in the number of electric vehicles on the roads


Legal Alert - August 2017
  • SSEK Indonesian Legal Consultants
  • Indonesia
  • September 11 2017

Minister of Agriculture (“MOA”) Regulation No. 13PERMENTANPK.24052017 dated May 12, 2017, regarding Livestock and Animal Husbandry Business


FOIA lawsuit seeking coal liquefaction documents dismissed
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • August 19 2011

A federal court in New York has dismissed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit seeking U.S. Air Force documents related to fuel contracts involving a coal liquefaction energy project.


Climate change and the technology sector - the Carbon Reduction Commitment
  • Norton Rose Fulbright
  • United Kingdom
  • February 4 2010

From April 2010, the Carbon Reduction Commitment Energy Efficiency Scheme (CRC) - a new mandatory cap and trade scheme for carbon dioxide (CO) emissions aimed at incentivising energy efficiency - will come into force in the UK.


Court's ruling holds one shiny gift and one lump of coal for employers
  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • USA
  • December 26 2009

A federal district court in Idaho has ruled in Alamar Ranch, LLC, v. County of Boise that an employee waived the attorney-client privilege by communicating with her lawyer over her employer's email system, where the employer had a clear policy of monitoring employee communications.



Kevin Lemke
  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP