We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.


Clear all

Refine your search

Content type


Firm name


315 results found


Foley & Lardner LLP | USA | 6 Dec 2016

Five Things You Should Know for 2017 About Cross-Border IP Licensing and Insolvency Law

Brexit. Trump. The year 2016 can be characterized as one of unpredicted results and impending uncertainty. In June, the UK electorate voted to leave


Bracewell LLP | USA | 17 Nov 2016

Attorney-Client Privilege in Washington State No Longer Applies When Employment Ends

In order to preserve the attorney-client privilege, counsel who conduct internal investigations begin employee interviews with an “Upjohn Warning”a


Proskauer Rose LLP | USA | 11 Nov 2016

NLRB Majority Stuns Nation By Ruling Employer Has Management Right, Chairman Dissents

In another example of the inconsistency of the current state of Board law, a 2-1 majority of the NLRB ruled that an employer not only had a


Seyfarth Shaw LLP | USA | 7 Nov 2016

Board Defers to Arbitrator’s Award Upholding Management Rights-But for How Long?

In Weavexx, LLC the Board deferred to an arbitrator’s finding that the employer had the right to change its payday and pay cycle without first


Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP | USA | 26 Oct 2016

Design Patent Post-Grant: Is Anticipation Easier to Prove Than Obviousness?

While waiting to see how the Federal Circuit affects the PTAB’s application of a broad standard for design patents, it will be important to look out for overlaps in the legal standards for anticipation and obviousness.


Klarquist Sparkman LLP | USA | 2 Sep 2016

On remand, PTAB says it did consider an exhibit submitted to show the “state of the art”

In a decision on remand issued on August 15, 2016, a PTAB panel again found patentable claims 1-30 of Verinata Health's U.S. Patent No. 8,318,430


Clyde & Co LLP | United Kingdom | 20 Jul 2016

Documenting responsibility for contributing to DB schemes

The Court of Appeal's decision in the case of Heis v MF Global highlights the importance of documenting just who has responsibility for contributing


Mitchell Williams Selig Gates & Woodyard PLLC | USA | 29 Jun 2016

Hazardous Waste Enforcement: Alabama Department of Environmental Management and Theodore, Alabama Paint Manufacturing Facility Enter into Special Order by Consent Addressing Alleged Violations

The Alabama Department of Environmental Management (“ADEM”) entered into a Special Order by Consent (“Order”) dated June 7th addressing an alleged


Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP | USA | 29 Jun 2016

Modtruss Stumbles on “Same” Problem with Battlefrog Obstacles - Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief Denied

This post follows up on this post on Judge Ross’s Order of June 6, 2016, in which she allowed Modtruss, Inc. (“Modtruss”), to clarify its intent with


Foley & Lardner LLP | USA | 24 May 2016

Seventh Circuit Clarifies That Lawyers Can Appeal Nonmonetary Sanctions

Imagine that, at the end of a case, the judge decides to impose sanctions on you for the way in which you have handled discovery, or done something

Previous page 1 2 3 ...