We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results:1-10 of 255

Commercial Court in London Reinforces Practice of Freezing Orders Requiring Disclosure of All of a Respondent’s Assets
  • Dechert LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • July 18 2018

The recent decision of the London Commercial Court in PJSC Tatneft v Gennady Bogolyubov & Ors 2018 EWHC 1314 (Comm) highlights the

European Account Preservation Orders - a new pro-creditor enforcement mechanism under Luxembourg law
  • NautaDutilh
  • Luxembourg, European Union
  • July 12 2018

On 18 January 2017, EU Regulation n6552014 establishing a European Account Preservation Order ("EAPO") procedure became fully applicable in all

"Very limited link" sees High Court dismiss request for worldwide freezing order
  • CMS
  • United Kingdom
  • June 29 2018

The English High Court recently decided that it was not appropriate to grant a worldwide freezing order, confirming that generally only a sufficiently

Court Places Assets in the Freezer
  • K&L Gates
  • Australia
  • June 21 2018

The Supreme Court of Western Australia has recently made a freezing order in the matter of Trans Global Projects Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) (TGP) v Duro

Freezing Orders - Koza v Akcil
  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • USA
  • June 19 2018

Frozen funds cannot be used to pay legal expenses of director where director has his own funds In Tidewater Marine v Phoenixtide Offshore, Males J

JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov & Anor: Court orders respondent to worldwide freezing order to disclose how his legal expenses are being funded
  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • June 15 2018

The claimant bank obtained a worldwide freezing order ("WFO") against the first defendant (Mr Ablyazov) and the second defendant, in order to restrain

Singapore and BVI Courts co-operate against cross border fraud
  • Harneys
  • Singapore, British Virgin Islands
  • June 11 2018

A decision dated 1 June 2018 of the Court of Appeal in Singapore (the Singapore Court) that reinstated and expanded a Mareva injunction against

Freezing Orders - JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov & Anor
  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • June 8 2018

Court orders respondent to worldwide freezing order to disclose how his legal expenses are being funded The claimant bank obtained a worldwide

Factors to be considered when challenging freezing orders
  • United Kingdom
  • May 23 2018

In the recent case of State Bank of India & Others v Dr Vijay Mallya & Others 2018 EWHC 1084 (Comm), the court considered how various factors are to

State Bank of India v Mallya: Court finds risk of dissipation in a freezing order application and considers material non-disclosure point
  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • India
  • May 22 2018

The judge in this case found that a risk of dissipation had been made out on the facts in an application for a freezing order. In particular, the