We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 51

Midnight Madness The FDA Continues To Discount First Amendment Implications Of Restrictions On Off-Label Promotion
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • USA
  • January 27 2017

This guest post is from Liz Minerd, an associate at Reed Smith. She previously wrote the post on the FDA’s off-label promotion meeting last November


The U.S. Supreme Court's decision inCIGNA Corp. v. Amara - a mixed bag for plan sponsors
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • USA
  • June 6 2011

The recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in the class action case of CIGNA Corp. v. Amara contains both good news and bad news for ERISA plan sponsors


When is 'Without Prejudice' not 'Without Prejudice'?
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • USA
  • November 19 2010

The Supreme Court has just delivered confirmation of one of the exceptions to the legal principle of "Without Prejudice" (WP) (Oceanbulk Shipping & Trading SA -v- TMT Asia Limited & Ors 2010 UKSC 44


Supreme Court recognises new exception to the without prejudice rule
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • November 3 2010

In Oceanbulk Shipping and Trading SA v TMT Asia Ltd 2010 UKSC 44, the Supreme Court has recognised a new exception to the rule that communications made in a genuine attempt to reach a settlement are protected from being used as evidence by either party to proceedings


U.S. Supreme Court upholds public employer's search of employer-provided communication devices
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • USA
  • June 25 2010

The US Supreme Court held that a public employer's review of transcripts of an employee's text messages on an employer-issued pager constituted a reasonable search under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution


New Jersey High Court limits employer's right to review employee emails
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • USA
  • April 29 2010

Recently, in Stengart v. Loving Care Agency, the New Jersey Supreme Court held that an employee had a reasonable expectation of privacy in her Internet-based emails to her lawyer, despite the fact that she sent such emails from a company-owned laptop and was on notice of the employer’s written policy that emails may not be considered “private or personal.”


SEC reaffirms shareholder proposal authority and promotes electronic forums
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • USA
  • November 30 2007

In an effort both to address litigation surrounding shareholder director nominations on public company proxy cards and to promote communication among shareholders and public companies, the Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted rules to codify its interpretation of Rule 14a-8(i)(8) and facilitate the use of shareholder electronic forums


William Sutton
  • Reed Smith LLP

Derek J. Baker
  • Reed Smith LLP