We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 107

In the PipelineHighlighting Changes of Interest to Employers in Australia
  • Jones Day
  • Australia
  • August 6 2018

Foodora delivery drivers are engaged under an independent contractor arrangement and are required to sign an "Independent Contractor Agreement" when


Unsupported Expert Opinion Insufficient To Contradict The Prior Art
  • Jones Day
  • USA
  • June 14 2018

In Ericsson Inc. v. Intellectual Ventures I LLC, No. 2016-1671, 2018 WL 2407172 (Fed. Cir. 2018), a divided panel of the Federal Circuit reversed a


Monthly UpdateAustralian Labour & Employment
  • Jones Day
  • Australia
  • June 3 2018

In this edition of the Update, we report on the recent filing of proceedings against Foodora, a food delivery business, for sham contracting


Pharmaceutical & Medical Device Regulatory Update, Vol. IV, Issue 1
  • Jones Day
  • USA
  • April 12 2017

One day before the final rule, "Clarification of When Products Made or Derived From Tobacco Are Regulated as Drugs, Devices, or Combination Products


Google Inc. v. Locationet Systems Ltd., CBM2016-00062 - Institution Denied
  • Jones Day
  • USA
  • November 4 2016

In a decision dated October 25, 2016, the PTAB denied institution of Google Inc.'s petition for Covered Business Method Patent Review (CBM) of claims


Pharmaceutical & Medical Device Regulatory Update, Vol. III, Issue 7
  • Jones Day
  • USA
  • September 21 2016

On November 9 and 10, 2016, FDA will host a public hearing to obtain feedback on the Agency's regulation of communications by manufacturers, packers


Publicized Dawn Raid Evidences Australia's Vigorous Approach to Antitrust Investigations
  • Jones Day
  • Australia
  • August 2 2016

A dawn raid on a high-profile target conducted last week by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) highlights this enforcer's


New York Reins In "Common Interest" Doctrine
  • Jones Day
  • USA
  • July 21 2016

In June 2016, New York's highest court reversed an important 2014 decision by an intermediate appellate court that had expanded the application of


"No-contact" rule does not apply during investigation stage of FCA matter
  • Jones Day
  • USA
  • September 6 2011

As part of its investigation into allegations raised in qui tam suits under the False Claims Act ("FCA"), the government tried to interview several Amgen employees without an Amgen attorney present


Supreme Court clarifies what it means to "make" a statement for Rule 10b-5 liability
  • Jones Day
  • USA
  • June 17 2011

On June 13, 2011, the United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 opinion delivered by Justice Thomas, held that an entity that does not have ultimate authority and control over the content of a statement or whether and how to communicate the statement does not "make" the statement for purposes of liability under Rule 10b-5