We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 113

A Dark Time for Data: WHOIS Blackout Period Likely Starting in May
  • Cooley LLP
  • USA, European Union, Global
  • April 18 2018

What do you do when you want to look up the owner of a domain name? You probably perform a "WHOIS search" to find out the owner's name and contact


Registry announces WHOIS access charges, NGOs take aim at watch list plans, INTA applauds ‘Brand India’: news round-up
  • World Trademark Review
  • USA, Norway, United Kingdom, Canada, European Union, Global
  • April 17 2018

Every Tuesday and Friday, World Trademark Review presents a round-up of news, developments and insights from across the trademark sphere. In our


Australian trademark law amendments, WHOIS fears, and EUIPO launches anti-counterfeit prize: news round-up
  • World Trademark Review
  • USA, Pakistan, Philippines, Australia, European Union, Global, Iceland
  • March 30 2018

Every Tuesday and Friday, World Trademark Review presents a round-up of news, developments and insights from across the trademark sphere. In our


US Customs head confirmed, Latvia trims WHOIS data, and trademark offers Cambridge Analytica clues: news round-up
  • World Trademark Review
  • USA, South Korea, United Kingdom, Canada, Global, India, Latvia
  • March 20 2018

Every Tuesday and Friday, World Trademark Review presents a round-up of news, developments and insights from across the trademark sphere. In our


Winning the Fight Against Email Spam Plaintiffs
  • Kronenberger Rosenfeld LLP
  • USA
  • June 26 2016

There have been many changes in the realm of email spam law since 2003, which was the year when both the federal CAN-SPAM Act and the California


Body of message satisfied spam law, California appellate court rules
  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • USA
  • November 19 2014

In dismissing a putative class action against a marketing company, a California appellate court ruled that as long as the sender's name can be


Appeals court dismisses spam suit against Guthy-Renker
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • November 6 2014

A California appeals court has dismissed a putative class action alleging that Guthy-Renker LL C violated state anti-spam laws by sending the


Proxy domain registration may violate the CAN-SPAM Act
  • Klein Moynihan Turco LLP
  • USA
  • July 4 2013

A recent ruling by the United States District Court for the District of Utah points towards a nationwide shift in the interpretation of the


Commercial email advertisements using both proxyprivately registered domains and generic from lines deemed unlawful
  • Venable LLP
  • USA
  • March 15 2012

The California appellate court’s decision in Balsam v. Trancos requires marketers nationwide using commercial email advertisements to include in the from line of each email a domain name that is registered to the sender which can be determined by performing a WHOIS look-up, or the name of the sender or marketer on whose behalf the email was sent


Act now to prevent use of your trademark with the new adult entertainment industry TLD
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • October 4 2011

A new top level domain will soon be available for use by adult entertainment providers