We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.


Refine your search

Content type
Firm name

109 results found


Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP | USA | 5 Jul 2011

Merely stating that testing of potentially infringing products is expensive is not good cause to amend infringement contentions under Northern District of California's Patent Rules

Recently, a Court in the Central District of California, applying the Patent Rules from the Northern District of California, held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate the requisite good cause to amend its infringement contentions to add additional accused products.

Previous page 1 2 3 ...