We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-3 of 3

McGeoghean v. McGeoghean
  • Day Pitney LLP
  • USA
  • August 15 2011

In McGeoghean v. McGeoghean, Case No. 10-P-407, 2011 Mass. App. Unpub. LEXIS 936 (Aug. 3, 2011), a decision issued pursuant to Rule 1:28, the Appeals Court affirmed the superior court's judgment in all respects


Hiller v. Hiller
  • Day Pitney LLP
  • USA
  • May 11 2010

In Hiller v. Hiller, Case No. 09-P-656, 2010 Mass. App. Unpub. LEXIS 455 (Apr. 28, 2010), another decision issued pursuant to Rule 1:28, the description of the underlying facts is scant, but two legal propositions relied upon by the Appeals Court are worth repeating


McGeoghean v. McGeoghean
  • Day Pitney LLP
  • USA
  • August 5 2009

In McGeoghean v. McGeoghean, 2009 Mass. Super. LEXIS 147 (Suffolk Sup. Ct. June 1, 2009), a Superior Court decision from June that was just recently reported, the Court addressed a number of issues relating to a mother's distribution of her assets -- including the family business, real estate, real estate investments, and cash -- to her five children