We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 305

Food and Beverage News and Trends
  • DLA Piper
  • USA
  • February 21 2018

This regular publication by DLA Piper lawyers focuses on helping clients navigate the ever-changing business, legal and regulatory landscape

Michigan Strikes Back . . . In Pennsylvania
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • USA
  • December 15 2017

A (relatively) long time ago in a state not so far away, the Michigan Legislature enacted the Michigan Product Liability Act. It contained a

M.D. PA Declines to Dismiss MonitoringDeclaratory Judgment Action vs. Blood Temperature Regulation Device
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • USA
  • October 25 2017

We thought we were on a winning streak on medical monitoring. In August, we blogged about plaintiff lawyers stumbling in their efforts to walk the

Balancing State and Federal Informed Consent Law
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • October 5 2017

The passage of the 21st Century Cures Act ("Cures Act") and revisions to the Common Rule (45 CFR Part 46) ("Common Rule") in the last year mandated

Pennsylvania court dismisses off-label promotion claims as preempted
  • Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
  • USA
  • June 21 2017

A recent opinion out of the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas reinforces the notion that claims asserted by private plaintiffs based on alleged

How Sweet It Isn’t
  • Crowell & Moring LLP
  • USA
  • June 20 2017

The last few years have seen a war waged on sugar. In addition to increased media attention, USDA and the Department of Health and Human Services have

M.D. Pa. Finds No Specific Personal Jurisdiction over Parent Company
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • USA
  • October 4 2016

Not all personal jurisdiction cases coming out of Pennsylvania are bad. To be sure, an ED Pa judge’s recent embrace of the consent theory to get

Product hopping and antitrust: Mylan court dismisses claims on summary judgment, citing need to avoid chilling pharmaceutical innovation
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • USA
  • May 29 2015

A recent summary judgment opinion from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania breaks new ground in the developing antitrust law on “product hopping”

Pennsylvania Supreme Court allows negligent design and marketing claims against drug manufacturer to proceed
  • Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP
  • USA
  • March 5 2014

In Lance v. Wyeth, --- A.3d ---, 2014 WL 260309 (Pa. Jan. 21, 2014), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that pharmaceutical companies can be held

Lance v. Wyeth: a new cause of action in Pennsylvania?
  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • USA
  • January 28 2014

Issuing an opinion over two years after oral argument, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled last week in Lance v. Wyeth that pharmaceutical companies