We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results:1-10 of 100

Another PMA Preemption Victory
  • Dechert LLP
  • USA
  • May 8 2018

This one comes from Alabama and it’s pretty straightforward - Plaintiff’s claims are preempted and therefore dismissed with a little wiggle room left

N.D. Alabama Issues Mixed Bag of Branded Preemption Rulings
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • USA
  • May 16 2017

We like bright lines in the law. They streamline arguments for lawyers and, more important, they make it easier for non-lawyers to conduct their

Alabama Supreme Court: Brand-name pharmaceutical manufacturer can be sued for injury caused by generic product
  • Sills Cummis & Gross PC
  • USA
  • March 5 2013

In Wyeth, Inc. v. Weeks, No. 1101397, 2013 Ala. LEXIS 2 (Ala. Jan. 11, 2013), the Alabama Supreme Court joined courts in California and Vermont in

Am I my competitor’s keeper? Alabama’s highest court holds brandname prescription drug manufacturer liable for claims on a generic drug used by the plaintiff
  • Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
  • USA
  • February 5 2013

The Supreme Court of Alabama recently held that "under Alabama law, a brand-name drug company may be held liable for fraud or misrepresentation (by

Fresh squeezed or made from concentrate?
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • June 17 2011

Alabama and Indiana residents have filed a putative class action alleging violation of state consumer protection laws by a company that promotes its orange juice as “not from concentrate juice” and “100 pure Florida squeezed,” when it allegedly “contains orange juice concentrate and water.”