We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search

Refine your search

Content type
Tags
Jurisdiction
Firm name
Author

174 results found

Article

Stoel Rives LLP | USA | 28 Sep 2011

Ninth Circuit: "re-registration" of domain name registered before trademark was adopted cannot support claim under Anti-cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act

A new decision by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals highlights the risks brand owners face when adopting a new trademark that also happens to correspond to an Internet domain name already registered to someone else.

Article

Greenberg Traurig LLP | USA | 24 Jun 2010

Second Circuit denies NLRB petition in light of New Process Steel v. NLRB

In what looks to be the first application of New Process Steel v. NLRB by a court of appeals, on June 23, 2010, the Second Circuit denied the NLRB's petition for enforcement of an order issued by the 2-member Board.

Article

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP | USA | 30 Jun 2009

Assigning premerger agreements to the merged entity does not change the scope of the obligation, only the identity of the obligated party

In Epistar Corp. v. International Trade Commission, No. 07-1457 (Fed. Cir. May 22, 2009), the Federal Circuit affirmed the ITC’s claim construction but reversed the ITC’s estopping Epistar Corporation (“Epistar”) from arguing invalidity of the patent-in-suit and remanded for reconsideration.

Article

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP | USA | 13 Apr 2009

Is an exclusive dealing contract an unlawful covenant not to compete?

California has a strict code section that declares that covenants not to compete are unlawful except in limited circumstances.

Article

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP | USA | 27 Mar 2009

Tafas v. Doll

The Federal Circuit recently weighed in on the ability of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to effect proposed controversial changes to the rules under which patent applications can be prosecuted.

Previous page 1 2 3 ...