We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results:1-10 of 54

Recent Illinois appellate court opinion addresses FOIA issues
  • Franczek Radelet PC
  • USA
  • September 19 2012

In a recent Illinois Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) decision, the Second District Appellate Court held that a public body was required to release redacted copies of records to a requester, even if it seemed that nothing useful remained after redactions.

7th Cir. rules Chicago suburb’s parking ticket practice creates risk for ID theft
  • Arent Fox LLP
  • USA
  • August 31 2012

The 7th Circuit recently ruled that a Chicago suburb's policy of printing personal information such as an individual's name, home address, date of birth, sex, height, and weight on parking tickets violates the federal Driver's Privacy Protection Act (DPPA), thus reversing a lower court's dismissal of a class action complaint over the practice.

Who is on the hook for costs in paying subpoenaed peace officers?
  • Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
  • USA
  • May 12 2011

In Maddox v. City of Costa Mesa, 2011 DJDAR 4373 (2011), the California Fourth District Court of Appeal decided a unique issue arising under the California Government Code section 68097.2.

The Supreme Court today - November 15, 2010
  • Dorsey & Whitney LLP
  • USA
  • November 15 2010

The Supreme Court of the United States decided one set of consolidated cases this morning, in a single decision.

Governor announces regulatory reform accomplishments
  • Duane Morris LLP
  • USA
  • November 1 2010

Governor Paterson outlined accomplishments to date under Executive Order No. 25, which established New York's Regulatory and Reform Program.

State legislators continue to ping RFID technology
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • August 1 2008

Legislation is pending in a number of states designed to restrict usage of Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology for purposes of identifying and tracking individuals without their knowledge or consent.

Rachel R. Marmor
  • Davis Wright Tremaine LLP