We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 662

ALJ Shaw: ITC is a Viable Forum for Enforcement of SEPs
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • October 6 2017

The public version of ALJ Shaw’s Initial Determination (ID) in U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) investigation Certain Magnetic Data Storage

The Eastern District of Texas Again Broadly Applies IPR Estoppel and Finds a Joined Party in the IPR Is Also Subject to Estoppel
  • Knobbe Martens
  • USA
  • October 3 2017

A magistrate judge in the Eastern District of Texas recommended in Network-1 Technologies, Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc. Case No. 6:11-cv-492 (E.D

E.D. Tex. Finds that Prior Art Estoppel Applies to References Rather than Specific Combinations of References
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • USA
  • September 28 2017

Defendant Hewlett Packard filed a Petition for IPR challenging claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,218,930 as invalid in view of two prior art references. On

ITC Issues First Exclusion Order on SEPs and Upcoming Opinion Expected To Provide Important Guidance on FRAND and SEPs
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • September 5 2017

The decision in U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) investigation Certain Magnetic Data Storage Tapes and Cartridges Containing the Same, Inv

With or Without Prejudice?
  • WeirFoulds LLP
  • Canada
  • August 25 2017

A recent court decision in Ontario reminds us of the significant implications when communications are characterized as having been made "without

An Early Look at the Impact of Oil States
  • Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC
  • USA
  • June 23 2017

On June 12, 2017, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Oil States Energy Servs. LLC v. Greene’s Energy Grp., LLC, No. 16-712 (U.S. Jun. 12, 2017

Implied license to use replacement cartridges?
  • Bird & Bird
  • USA
  • June 21 2017

Today, the Court of Appeal of The Hague has published a judgment which could have far-reaching consequences for manufacturers of original appliances

Estop Confusing Us: District Courts Take Wildly Different Views on IPR Estoppel
  • Wolf Greenfield & Sacks PC
  • USA
  • June 20 2017

What is the scope of IPR estoppel? It depends. Not necessarily on the facts, but sometimes on the court: district courts continue to have divergent

Are Inter Partes Reviews “Quintessential” Agency Adjudications?
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • USA
  • June 19 2017

A superlative or excessive statement is often a dead give-away that the statement may not be true. In deciding whether the America Invents Act’s

AIA Trials Unconstitutional? Don't Bet on It
  • Oblon
  • USA
  • June 13 2017

The Supreme Court has had at least three occasions over the past 7 months to review the constitutionality of AIA trial proceedings it declined all