We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 685

Uncertainty of IPR Estoppel in District Courts Continues
  • Baker Botts LLP
  • USA
  • June 5 2018

One of the early-recognized pitfalls of inter partes review (IPR) proceedings was the statutory estoppel of 35 U.S.C. 315(e)(2) barring petitioners

PTAB Holds that a Merger Completed After the filing of Petition Can Create a Real Party-in-Interest Relationship
  • Sughrue Mion PLLC
  • USA
  • May 9 2018

In Cisco Systems v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, IPR2017-01933, Paper 9 (PTAB 2018) (Decision Denying Institution of Review), the Patent Trial

Delaware Court Of Chancery Applies Dell And DFC To Find “Fair Value” Of Widely Traded Company With No Controlling Stockholder Is Equal To Unaffected Market Price
  • Shearman & Sterling LLP
  • USA
  • February 27 2018

On January 26, 2018, Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster of the Delaware Court of Chancery ruled in a post-trial opinion that the thirty-day average

Delaware Court of Chancery Concludes that Company’s Unaffected Market Price Is the Best Evidence of Fair Value for Appraisal Valuation Purposes
  • Ropes & Gray LLP
  • USA
  • February 26 2018

Hewlett-Packard Company acquired Aruba Networks, Inc. for $24.67 per share in 2015. In Verition Partners Master Fund Ltd. v. Aruba Networks, Inc., an

Delaware Chancery Court in Aruba Appraisal Finds Fair Value to be the Pre-Announcement Market Price: 30 Below Deal Value
  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • USA
  • February 22 2018

In 2015, Hewlett Packard acquired Aruba for a negotiated price of $24.67 per share, or about $2.8 billion. Several stockholders sought appraisal. On

Damages opinion related to FRAND excluded due to lack of supporting evidence
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • February 14 2018

The Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division, Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell presiding, in Network-1 Techs., Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc

Supreme Court Considers Constitutional Challenge to Inter Partes Review
  • Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP
  • USA, United Kingdom
  • December 20 2017

The Court recently heard arguments in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene’s Energy Group, LLC on whether inter partes reviewan adversarial

Oil, PTAB, and the Seventh Amendment
  • Dilworth IP
  • USA
  • October 17 2017

Here is a case on the Supreme Court docket that could become a landmark decision for the patent community. Oil States Energy Services LLC v. Greene’s

ALJ Shaw: ITC is a Viable Forum for Enforcement of SEPs
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • October 6 2017

The public version of ALJ Shaw’s Initial Determination (ID) in U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) investigation Certain Magnetic Data Storage

The Eastern District of Texas Again Broadly Applies IPR Estoppel and Finds a Joined Party in the IPR Is Also Subject to Estoppel
  • Knobbe Martens
  • USA
  • October 3 2017

A magistrate judge in the Eastern District of Texas recommended in Network-1 Technologies, Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc. Case No. 6:11-cv-492 (E.D