We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results:1-10 of 125

Too much of a good thing: household product triggers pollution exclusion, because "quantity matters"
  • Jorden Burt LLP
  • USA
  • March 22 2013

Pollution exclusion clauses began appearing in commercial general liability policies when federal laws began making businesses liable for the cost of

Federal court dismisses RCRA claim, evidence insufficient to establish endangerment
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • March 25 2011

A federal court in Colorado has ruled insufficient to establish imminent and substantial endangerment under RCRA evidence that a site's contamination exceeds state standards and that a state environmental agency is involved in a cleanup.

Stephen T. Raptis
  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP

Samuel B. Boxerman
  • Sidley Austin LLP