We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-3 of 3

U.S. Supreme Court limits CERCLA liability of sellers of chemicals, and affirms that “joint and several” liability should not be imposed when responsibility for chemical releases can be reasonably apportioned
  • Hogan Lovells
  • USA
  • May 6 2009

One of the most dreaded aspects of the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund) is that under the principle of joint and several liability, a potentially responsible party (PRP) may be compelled to pay for all of the cleanup costs at a CERCLA site, leaving such PRP to pursue a contribution action under 113(f) of CERCLA against other PRPs whom the government, for whatever reason, decided not to pursue.


Ryan M. Rowberry
  • Hogan Lovells