We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-10 of 20

Pennsylvania high court affirms notice-prejudice rule inapplicable to claims-made policies
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • June 12 2009

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has affirmed without opinion a Pennsylvania Superior Court ruling that insurers that issued a claims-made-and-reported policy need not prove prejudice in order to deny coverage based on late notice.


New Hampshire Supreme Court adopts pro rata allocation methodology in environmental coverage case
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • December 11 2007

In a matter of first impression, the New Hampshire Supreme Court recently held that a pro rata allocation method, as opposed to a joint and several approach, should be applied in an environmental coverage action for purposes of allocating long-term pollution damage among multiple triggered insurance policies.


Dorian Drew
  • Norton Rose Fulbright




Charles Evans
  • Norton Rose Fulbright

Jeanne Kohler
  • Locke Lord LLP


David Handley
  • Clyde & Co LLP