Search
Refine your search
1,334 results found
Lexology PRO | European Union, United Kingdom | 10 May 2021
CAT upholds pay-for-delay decision but trims penalties
The UK’s specialist competition tribunal has confirmed that GlaxoSmithKline and three generic drugmakers broke competition rules by entering into pay-for-delay agreements for the antidepressant drug paroxetine – but slashed the original fines by £27 million.
Edgeworth Economics | USA | 24 Jul 2020
Lamictal and the Myth of “Generic” “Pay-for-Delay” Cases
On April 22, 2020, the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit overturned a district court decision certifying a class of direct purchaser…
Addleshaw Goddard LLP | United Kingdom | 8 Jul 2020
Major success for AG Product Litigation team with indemnity costs award for GSK in long-running Seroxat litigation
On 3 July 2020, Lambert J handed down judgment in the High Court in the Seroxat Group Litigation, bringing to an end 13 years of litigation on the…
White & Case LLP | European Union, United Kingdom | 14 Feb 2020
Court of Justice ruling in Paroxetine
The European Court of Justice's ruling in Paroxetine, handed down in record time just before Brexit, confirms the narrow interpretation of…
Bereskin & Parr LLP | Canada, USA | 13 Mar 2019
GSK thwarts the attempted “scooping” of its HORLICKS trademark
The Federal Court of Canada has rejected an application by Bedessee Imports Ltd., an importer and distributor of food products, including beverages…
Macfarlanes LLP | United Kingdom | 25 Feb 2019
Serious Fraud Office drops two major bribery investigations
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has dropped its investigations into individuals at Rolls Royce PLC and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). The decision to halt two…
Hardwicke | United Kingdom | 3 Jan 2019
ATE and security for costs: Lewis Thermal Limited v Cleveland Cable Company Ltd
This is the third occasion on which I have posted on this blog on the issue of after the event insurance (ATE) policies and the impact which they have…
Herbert Smith Freehills LLP | United Kingdom | 7 Nov 2018
Information gathering by in-house lawyer in order to obtain external advice may not be protected by legal advice privilege
In a recent decision, the High Court has held that an in-house lawyer’s communications with an employee of the business, who was accepted to be her…
Clyde & Co LLP | United Kingdom | 5 Nov 2018
Disclosure by mistake: Glaxo Wellcome v Sandoz
Judge considers issues relating to legal advice privilege and disclosure of a document by mistake Two issues arose to be decided in this case: (1)…
Matheson | Ireland | 24 Oct 2018
Public Procurement Case Law Update: Sanofi v HSE
Life Sciences businesses eagerly awaited the High Court judgment of 12 October on Sanofi v HSE. It is the first final Irish court judgment on a…
