We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 732

The British Columbia Court of Appeal Upholds Certification of Another Class Action for Undisclosed Fees
  • Babin Bessner Spry LLP
  • Canada
  • November 28 2017

Undisclosed fees charged by financial institutions and other perceived “deep pocket” organizations have attracted class actions across Canada and the

TCPA Tracker - November 2017
  • Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • USA
  • October 30 2017

On November 16, 2017, the FCC Commissioners voted to adopt a Report and Order that expressly authorizes voice service providers to block certain types

4 Out of 5 IPRs Ain’t Bad: Judge Oetken Grants Motion to Stay Pending Resolution of IPR Proceedings Despite Advanced Stage of Litigation
  • Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP
  • USA
  • October 30 2017

On October 27, 2016, District Judge J. Paul Oetken (S.D.N.Y.) granted defendant Comcast Corp.'s ("Comcast") motion to stay the case pending resolution

Comcast patent purchase fails to deliver desired result
  • Navigant Consulting Inc
  • USA
  • October 25 2017

An Eastern District of Pennsylvania jury decision confirmed that when apportionment calculations for complex technologies do not clearly demonstrate

Recent Case Highlights the Breadth of the ITC’s “Sufficient Involvement” Standard for Establishing Jurisdiction over Respondents
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • August 28 2017

The International Trade Commission ("ITC") wields broad jurisdiction over unfair practices in importation under Section 337. The importation or sale

Judge Oetken Construes Twenty-Nine Claim Terms in “Relatively Large” Markman Opinion
  • Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP
  • USA
  • August 21 2017

On August 10, 2017, District Judge Paul Oetken (S.D.N.Y.) construed 29 claim terms in a dispute between Defendant Comcast Corporation, et al

ISP Privacy Rule Update: Federal Government Out, State Governments In
  • Harter Secrest & Emery LLP
  • USA
  • May 8 2017

The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) adopted rules in 2016 that restricted Internet Service Providers (“ISPs”), such as Verizon, AT&T, and

Prejudgment Interest Can Recover for Acts Prior to Patent Issuance
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • April 27 2017

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found that the defendant failed to sufficiently allege any prejudice caused by alleged errors relating

ITC Institutes Investigation (337-TA-1041) Regarding Certain Digital Television Set-Top Boxes And Remote Control Devices
  • Oblon
  • USA
  • March 1 2017

On February 27, 2017, the U.S. International Trade Commission ("Commission") issued a press release announcing their vote to institute an

Court Permits Evidence from Damages Expert that Relies on Forward Citation Analysis, Comparable Settlement Agreements, and Preference for Lump Sum Agreements
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • January 3 2017

Determining the right amount of damages in patent infringement cases often involves complex analyses provided by damages experts. When requested